PARTICIPATION OF PARTNERS IN RESEARCH-INDUSTRY LINKAGES WITH REFERENCE TO DAIRY AND POULTRY SECTORS IN ANDIIRA PRADESH

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2015-12
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY TIRUPATI - 517 502. (A.P.) INDIA
Abstract
ABSTRACT: An ex-post-facto research design was adopted for the present study conducted in the state of Andhra Pradesh. Keeping in view of the importance of linkage between the research and industries in livestock sector, the present study was undertaken in AP by selecting the Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University and Livestock Industries i.e., dairy, poultry and pharmaceutical industries as research and industry units respectively. Availability sampling procedure was followed to select 60 researchers from the university (academic institutions and research stations) and I I units from industry (dairy, poultry and pharmaceutical industrial units), whereas, purposive sampling procedure was followed to select 40 industry personnel from the respective industrial units. The data from both the researchers and industry personnel were collected personally with the help of two interview schedules and the findings were processed, analyzed and interpreted. The salient findings of the research work were as follows.. Majority of (76.70%) researchers of the study area were male and 11early half of the researchers from the university belonged to Professor/Principal Scientist category. Majority (48.33%) of researchers were in middle age group. About one thirds (33.33%) of the scientists had 13-22 years of job ex:.erience and 3 1.67 per cent of the researchers had 3-12 years of job experience. More than three fourths (80%)) of the researchers handled projects four or less than hat and majority (63.33%) of the researchers received trainings in between 1-4. Nearly three fourths of the researchers had medium level of job satisfaction and job motivation. More than half of the researchers were with medium role clarity. Nearly two thirds (68.33%) of the researchers felt that they were working under medium level of organisational climate and they were with medium knowledge in communication methods.Almost all researchers had medium achievement motivation. Most of (90%) of the ~ndustryp ersorule1 of the \tudy area were ~nalea nd more than half (57.50%) of the respondent\ were po\t-graduate\. Major~ty (60%) of ~ndu\try persa~ewl ere in the age group of 29-44 yeam. Nearly half of industry personnel had leas them 15 years of job experience, whereas, 60 per cent of respondents received trainings in the range of 1-5 in number. Majority (60%) of industry personnel had medium job satisfaction and more than threc fourths (85%) were with medium level of job motivation. Nearly two thirds of the industry personnel had medium role clarity and they felt that they wem working under medium organisationd climate. Majority (60%) of industry personnel had medium level of achievement. Nearly two thirds of the researchers and industry personnel had medium level of perception. Whe-zxw, the extent of participation in R-I linkage activities among both the majority researchers and industry personnel was found low. Among the researchers, designation, age, total job experience, trainings received, role clarity and organizational climate were found significantly related with perception of researchers about University Research-Industry (UR-I) linkages at 0.01 level of probability. whereas, experience in research was found significant at 0.05 level of probability. All chuacteristics of researchers put together could explain variation in perception of researchers towards University Research-industry (UR-I)li nkages to the extent of 40.70 per cent. Designation, age. job experience in research, total job experience. total projects handled, trainings received and role clarity were found significantly related with extent of participation at 0.01 level of probability, whereas, gender was found significant at 5 per cent level of significance. Among the characteristics studied, age, trainings received and total job experience of researchers were found each character individually contributing, significantly and positively to the extent of participation at 0.05 level of probability. Among the industry personnel age, total job experience and trainings received were found significantly related with perception of industry personnel about UR-I linkages at 0.01 level of probability. whereas. achievement motivation was found significant at 0.05 level of probability. All characteristics of industry personnel put together could explain variation in perception about UR-I linkages to the extent of 48.10 per cent. Age and total job experience were found significantly related with extent of participation at 0.01 level of probability. whereas, trainings received was found significant at 0.05 level of probability. The mean scores for motivation and organisational climate were high among industry personnel compared to the researchers. Major constraints faced by researchers while participating in communication linkages were lack of funds in department for conducting linkage activities, lack of time due to other responsibilities delegated and non-conducive organizational climate in the university. Whereas, major constraints faced while participating in working linkages with the industries were less access to know about the industry needs, lack of demand from industry, guidelines and regulations of university in conducting rescarch, lack of good laboratory practices (GLPs) and good clinical practices (GCPs), less access to external funding/sponsorships, focused attc -tion on small scale farmers and lack of - - enough man power in university research and extension. Suggestions from the university researchers to strengthen the CJR-I linkages were: data of technologies generated should be made available and popularized by the university, scientists need to focus on corrlrnercialization of the generated technologies, industries should approach university periodically for the timely technical solutions and they should providk-funding for the research projects to be carried out by the university scientists, separate funding must be allotted by the university for research and conducting linkage activities, there is a need of MOU between UR and Industry to conduct research projects, exposure visits at regular intervals to livestock industry sectors, introduction of Public Private Partnaship (PW) in livestock research, establishment of more regional and separate livestock research wings, establishment of University Research-Industry-Advisory-CounciI (URIAC) and Research-Extension- Industry Council (REIC), there is a need to strengthen research institutes in terms of technical, financial and human resources, and university need to provide timely incentives for development and standardization of GLPs, GCPs in the university. Many of the industry personnel expressed their constraints while participating in communication linkages with university namely lack of extension wing in industry, lack of time to participate in communication linkage with research, lack of interest and desire to participate in communication linkages with research. Whereas, major constraints while participating in working linkages with the universities were lack of information about the expertise and capabilities within the university, lack of good laboratory practices (GLPs) and good clinical practices (GCPs) in university. instructions/guidelines to consider their own research fmdings. conflicts of interest and commitment betwoen the partners. maintenance of confidentiality in technological issues by industry, besides. poor BOC~SS to research other than the research of industry and lack of reliability on research generated by other public agencies. Suggestions from the industry pemtnnel to strengthen the UR-I linkago wcre: there is a need of separate extension wing in industry, Livestock Technology Information Centre (LTIC) at university. interactive sessions with university scientific staff at regular intervals i-e., conducting of workshops, conferences, official meetings etc., authenticated research findings from UR, timely need based solutions from university for industry problems, establishment of Research Incubation Centers (RICs) by both the partners, besides, there is a need to encourage Participatory Technology Development (PTD) by the partners and university research need to focus on practical solutions rather than theoretical approach.
Description
THESES
Keywords
null
Citation
Collections