Thumbnail Image

Thesis

Browse

2012 - 20133
Reset filters
Subject: Veterinary Public Health × End date: 2013 × Start date: 2012 × Type: Thesis ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    STUDIES ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN WATER, SOIL, FODDER AND MILK ALONG MUST RIVER BELT
    (SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY TIRUPATI - 517 502. (A.P.) INDIA, 2013-10) KOTINAGU, KORRAPATI; KRISHNAIAH, N(MAJOR); MADAHAVA RAO, T; KONDAL REDDY, K; SASHI BHUSHAN, V
    ABSTRACT: A study was conducted to estimate residues of certain pesticides of organochlorines viz., DDT (o,p'- DDE, o,p' - DDD, p,p'- DDT and o,p'- DDT and Dicofol), HCH (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta), cyclodiene compounds (Aldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate and Heptachlor) and organophosphates (Triazophos, Dimetheoate, Chlorpyrifos and Methyl-chlorpyrifos) in soil, water, fodder and milk samples collected from six zones of Musi river belt area. To evaluate the pollution level of Musi river, the river belt was divided in to six zones viz., Zone 1 (Attapur to High court), Zone 2 (Chadhar ghat to Uppal), Zone 3 (Peerzadiguda to Chinna viralla), Zone 4 (Pillai Palli to Alinagar), Zone 5 (Indriyala to Manimadde), Zone 6 (Musi reservoir to Wazirabad). Only soil samples collected hm Zone 1 showed residual levels (in ppm) of 0.06 + 0.005 (0.035 to 0.083), 0.73 * 0.01 (0.675 to 0.791), 1.27 * 0.09 (1.023 to l.893), 0.14 =k 0.015 (0.098 to 0.243) and 0.55 * 0.02 (0.481 to 0.685) for p,p'- DDE, o,p'- DDD, p,p'- DDT, o,p' - DDT and Total DDT respectively. Dicofol was present only in fodder samples of zone 5 at concentration of 0.07 + 0.0007 (0.071 to 0.077). Among HCH compounds only delta HCH was found in soil samples of Zone 1 at a concentration of 0.08 *0.003 (0.065 to 0.098). Water, fodder and milk samples from zone 2 to 6 did not contain any residues of DDT and HCH. None of the samples water, soil, fodder and Milk from all the 6 zones contain the residues of Cyclodiene compounds. Among organophosphorus compounds Triazophos was present in soil samples of zone 1 at a level of 0.03 * 0.001 (0.032 to 0.045) and Dimetheoate was present in milk samples collected from Zone 6 at a level of 0.13 & 0.006 (0.1 11 to 0.167). From this study, it can be concluded that all the pesticide residues in soil were well below the MRL values, whereas Dicofol in fodder and Dimethoate in milk were slightly above the MRL values specified by EU and CODEX.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LACTIC ACID BACTERIAL STRAINS FOR THEIR PROBIOTIC CHARACTERISTICS
    (SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY TIRUPATI - 517 502. (A.P.) INDIA, 2012-11) SRINU, B; MADHAVA RAO, T(MAJOR); SHASHI KUMAR, M; KONDAL REDDY, K
    ABSTRACT : Identifying probiotic characteristics of bacterial strains by in vitro studies forms basis for selection of functional probiotics for commercial use. The objective of study was to collect different cultures and screen to study their functional probiotic characteristics such as acid tolerance, bile tolerance, antibacterial activity, antibiotic sensitivity, temperature tolerance and acidifying activity. Among the eighteen Lactic acid bacterial strains studied, 15 showed good survivability at high bile salt concentration (0.3 to 2 % oxgall) and good growth at a pH of 1.5 to 3.5. These probiotic species showed good survival abilities in acidic pH 2.0 to 3.5 except Lactobacillus delbruckii bulgaricus 281, Bifidobacterium bifidum 232 and Bifidobacterium bifidum 235, which did not grow at pH 2.0. Lactobacillus fermentum 141 and Pediococcus acidolactici 252 was able to grow even at pH 1.5 also. All the 18 lactic acid bacterial strains showed a count (CFU/ml) in the range of 0.23x107 to 2.7x107 at pH 2.0 except Lactobacillus delbruckii bulgaricus 281, Bifidobacterium bifidum 232 and Bifidobacterium bifidum 235, which did not form detectable CFU/ml, whereas Lactobacillus helviticus 194 showed highest count of 2.7x107 CFU/ml at pH 2.0. Among all the Lactobacillus spp. Lactobacillus paraplantarum 321 and Lactobacillus paracasei 22 showed maximum growth at 0.3% oxgall concentrations similarly Bifidobacterium bifidum 233 and Bifidobacterium bifidum 236 showed maximum growth when compared to other bifidobacterial strains. Among eighteen Lactic acid bacterial strains Lactobacillus casei 17, Pediococcus acidolactici 252 (except Clindamycin), Lactobacillus delbruckii bulgaricus 281 (except for Nitrofurantoin, Clindamycin and Cefpodoxime) and Lactobacillus helviticus 194 (except for Gentamycin, Nitrofurantoin and Streptomycin) were resistant to all the antibiotics tested. Bifidobacterium bifidum 231 (except for Streptomycin and Kanamycin) and Bifidobacterium bifidum 236 (except Norfloxicin) showed resistance to all antibiotics tested. All these Lactic acid bacterial strains were screened for in vitro inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms namely Proteus vulgaris, E.coli ATCC, E.coli 448, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsialla pneumoneae, Salmonella typhimurium, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella para-B, Staphylococci aureus. All the eighteen strains showed good antibacterial activity against the tested pathogenic bacteria. The strains of Lactobacillus paraplantarum 321, Pedicocci acidolactici 252 and Lactobacillus bulgaricus 281 inhibited the growth of all pathogenic bacteria. Bifidobacterium bifidum 232 and Bifidobacterium bifidum 233 (except Bacillus cereus and Salmonella typhimurium) also inhibited the growth of all pathogens tested. All the eighteen Lactic acid bacterial strains showed growth at all the tested temperatures (15oC, 40oC, and 45oC) except Bifidobacterium bifidum 229, Lactobacillus fermentum 141 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus 18 which have shown growth only at the temperatures of 15oC and 40oC, except at 45oC Among twelve Lactobacillus spp. Lactobacillus helviticus 194 has shown the highest acidifying activity, whereas Lactobacillus casei 17 shown lowest acidifying activity. Similarly Bifidobacterium bifidum 231 shown highest acidifying activity, whereas Bifidobacterium bifidum 236 shown lowest acidification values when compared with the other Bifidobacterial strains. The present study identified functional probiotics for future in vivo studies to commercialize probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria to promote public health.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    STUDIES ON THE INCIDENCE OF CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
    (SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY , TIRUPATI – 517502. (A.P.) INDIA, 2013-09) SRIGOWTHAMI, PALETI; KRISHNAIAH, N (Major); Shashi Kumar, M; NARASIMHA REDDY, Y
    ABSTRACT : The present study was undertaken to compare conventional cultural, ELISA and PCR methods for detection of Campyloabcter spp. and C.jejuni, from livestock foods and environmental samples. Primers derived from 16SrRNA gene and flaA genes were used for specific amplification products of 283 bp and 450 bp for Campyloabcter spp. and C.jejuni respectively. To determine their suitability to PCR, four different template preparation methods viz. genomic DNA extraction, heat lysis, lysis buffers-1 and 2 were compared, of which heat lysis was found to be efficient and convenient. The specificity for Campylobacter spp. was tested using primers from 16S rRNA gene with 3 strains of Campylobacter and 7 other non Campylobacter strains which gave a specific 283 bp product for all Campylobacter strains only. Primers from flaA gene gave a specific 450 bp product only for C.jejuni and tested with 3 strains of Campylobacter. Evaluation of three selective broths, i.e. BB, PB and MHB broths for PCR compatibility, revealed that MHB and BB broths were superior over PB broth. Spiking studies were carried out by inoculating with pure culture of C.jejuni (500, 50 , 5 amd 0.5 CFU) in selective enrichment broths (48 h) which revealed that the minimum detection level was 0.5 CFU for both for Campylobacter and C.jejuni. Screening of 225 naturally contaminated samples (25 each of chicken meat, chicken faecal sample, mutton, eggs, beef, pork, fish, milk and water revealed 42 (chicken meat-10, chicken faeces-16, eggs-1, mutton-3, beef-2, pork-3, fish-2, milk-2 and water-3), 49 (chicken meat-12, chicken faeces-17, eggs-1, mutton-3, beef-3, pork-3, fish-3, milk-3 and water-4) and 56 (chicken meat-13, chicken faeces-19, eggs-2, mutton-4, beef-3, pork-4, fish-3, milk-3 and water-5) positive for Campylobacter spp. by cultural, ELISA and PCR methods respectively. Out of 56 positive for Campylobacter spp. by PCR 38 (chicken meat-10, chicken faeces-14, eggs-1, mutton-3, beef-2, pork-1, fish-2, milk-2 and water-3) was positive for C.jejuni.