IDENTIFICATION OF CANDIDATE RESISTANCE GENES IN POMEGRANATE (Punica granatum L.) AGAINST BACTERIAL BLIGHT CAUSED BY Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2018-08
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot (COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE, BAGALKOT)
Abstract
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) has gained worldwide popularity because of its highly nutritive and medicinal values. Bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae (Xap) is impeding production of pomegranate with estimated losses up to 80%. Breeding for bacterial blight resistant pomegranate varieties is economically viable and sustainable approach for management of bacterial blight. However, no genetic resistance sources are yet available and tolerant wild collections (Nana and Daru) are burdened with undesirable agronomic traits like small fruit size, high acidity and hard seed. For efficient utilization of wild accessions in breeding, identification of candidate genes for bacterial blight resistance and the corresponding bacterial effectors is crucial. The present study envisages screening of wild accessions of pomegranate for bacterial blight resistance, identification of bacterial effectors in Xap genomes and corresponding resistance gene analogues (RGAs) in pomegranate. Bacterial type III effectors were predicted using pEffect and TAL effectors were predicted using AnnoTALE suit. A total of 28 type III effectors and two TAL effectors were identified in Xap genome and were validated. Pomegranate RGAs were identified using RGAugury pipeline based on prediction of conserved motifs and domains, using pomegranate genome sequence, 958 host R genes were identified belonging to 277 nucleotide binding site (NBS) family proteins, 495 receptor-like kinases (RLK) and 81 receptor-like protein (RLP) families. Digital differential expression analysis of 958 RGAs using RNAseq data of bacterial blight tolerant pomegranate accession (IC-524027) and susceptible ‘Bhagwa’ revealed differential expression of 385 RGAs. Ten differentially expressed RGAs (fold change >5.0, 5 each of up-regulated and down regulated in tolerant) were further validated by semiquantitative PCR reverse transcription (RT-PCR). However, no significant difference in expression of RGAs was observed in RT-PCR between bacterial blight tolerant (UHSP-1) and susceptible Bhagwa varieties of pomegranate. Further, these RGAs have to be validated using more accurate quantitatjive real time PCR (qPCR). After validation, potential R genes could be used in breeding for bacterial blight resistance by marker assisted breeding, genetic engineering or genome editing.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections