Economic feasibility of fish farming-A study of Ludhiana district in Punjab
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Abstract
Fish farming plays a major role in the economic upliftment of the rural masses in Punjab.
Keeping this in view present study was planned to work out the economics of inland fish
production along with factors affecting the fish production in the study area and to investigate
the production and marketing constraints in fish farming. For this, Ludhiana district was
selected and a sample of 60 fish farmers was selected by using random sampling technique.
The results of the study brought out that growth in inland fish production was higher than
marine fish production during the last three decades. The quantity of fish exports had
increased more than 14 times during the last three decades. In Punjab also during the last two
decades, growth in area under fish farming was almost three times more than growth in
productivity. Cost-return analysis of fish farming on sample fish farms revealed that labour
cost, electricity usage, diesel use and aeration cost were the major constituents of variable
cost. On private fish farms, total variable cost per hectare was maximum on medium fish
farms (Rs. 2,07,554) followed by small (Rs. 2,00,752) and large (Rs. 1,83,844) farms.
However, on panchayati fish farms, total variable cost per hectare was maximum on small
fish farms (Rs. 1,81,418) followed by medium (Rs. 1,68,448) and large (Rs. 1,63,317) farms.
In overall, total variable cost per hectare was Rs. 2, 01,970 on private and Rs. 1,74,461 on
panchayati fish farms. On the contrary, fixed cost increased with farm size on private and
panchayati fish farms. Gross returns per hectare on private fish farms were higher (Rs.
3,15,417) than panchayati fish farms (Rs. 2,80,058). Net returns per hectare were higher on
panchayati fish farms (Rs. 85,244) as compared to private fish farms (Rs. 47,936). In overall,
the regression coefficients of area, marketing cost and labour were significant. The coefficient
of multiple determination (R2) was higher in large fish farms as 0.96 followed by medium
0.87 and small 0.77. The major problems in production and marketing were poaching, fish
diseases, flooding, less subsidy, low price, irregular payment and infrastructure facilities etc.
Major policy issues brought out were: higher subsidization of fish farming, adoption of
integrated fish farming and ensured regular payment etc.
Description
Keywords
null