Long term effect of field management on soil quality in ultisol

dc.contributor.advisorBetty Bastin
dc.contributor.authorNithya, A M
dc.contributor.authorKAU
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T05:24:32Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T05:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionPGen_US
dc.description.abstractSoil quality is directly related to agricultural sustainability. Assessment of soil quality is essential for determining the sustainability of land management systems. It is generally accepted that intensive agricultural production leads to a decline in soil quality. For this reason, it is highly essential to monitor soil quality to avoid soil degradation and in doing so, preserve the production capabilities of the land and protect environment. The response of soils to management and input depends on soil quality. It is therefore important to identify the soil characteristics responsible for changes in soil quality, which may eventually be considered as soil quality indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability. The present investigation has been undertaken to study the “Long term effect of field management on soil quality in Ultisol”. It was conducted in the main campus of Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara during December, 2012 to June, 2013. The objective of the study was to evaluate the soil quality under different long term field management conditions in an Ultisol (Vellanikkara series) based on physical, chemical and biological indicators. Here, an attempt has been made to evaluate the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil using available soil quality indicators. Five different fields were selected namely, natural forest, rubber plantation, cocoa garden, STCR experimental field and tapioca fields. Soil samples were collected from three depths namely 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-60 cm. The different sampling sites within each field were selected based on slope percentage. The samples were characterized for soil texture, aggregate size distribution, soil temperature, water holding capacity, single value constants, pH, EC CEC, AEC, SiO2/R2O3, organic carbon , lime requirement, available macronutrients, secondary nutrients, micronutrients, counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes and enzyme activity. The sampling areas were also surveyed and documented for the presence of earthworms and termites. The physical characteristics like water holding capacity, soil aggregate stability and soil temperature showed a decreasing trend with depth in the different fields. Forest ecosystem showed the most conducive physical characteristics followed by cocoa and rubber. The contents of available nutrients, secondary nutrients and micronutrients were found to be the highest in surface samples. The forest ecosystem showed relatively high values for organic carbon, and available nutrients like nitrogen, sulphur, boron, iron, manganese, zinc and copper. Microbial activity was found to be the highest in surface soils in almost all fields. The highest counts of bacteria and actinomycetes were reported in forest ecosystem and lowest in tapioca field. Fungal activity was found to be the highest in cocoa field followed by forest ecosystem. Enzyme activity was also found to be the highest in surface soils in the different fields. Soil quality was evaluated using available soil quality indicators. Based on scoring with the soil quality parameters, the highest scoring was observed for natural forest followed by cocoa field. Correlations between various soil quality parameters of different fields were also worked out. .en_US
dc.identifier.citation173390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810154308
dc.keywordsultisolen_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of soil science and agricultural chemistry, College of Horticulture,Vellanikkaraen_US
dc.subSoil Science and Agriculture Chemistryen_US
dc.themesoil quality in ultisolen_US
dc.these.typeM.Scen_US
dc.titleLong term effect of field management on soil quality in ultisolen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
173390.pdf
Size:
2.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections