EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF TURMERIC AND RESPONSE OF TURMERIC CV. SALEM TO ORGANICS AND INORGANIC FERTILISERS

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorHanamashetti, S I
dc.contributor.authorAnusuya, N S
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T04:58:18Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T04:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstract"Field trials were laid out as randomized block design with three replications on evaluation of different genotypes of turmeric and response of turmeric cv. Salem to organics and inorganic fertilizers, at Agricultural Research Station, Arabhavi during 2003-04. Among different genotypes evaluated, Salem recorded higher plant height (66.06 cm), number of leaves (13.33) at 150 days after planting. Maximum fresh rhizome and cured rhizome was recorded in Mango ginger (49.95 t / h a and 7.98 t/ha, respectively) followed by Salem recorded 6.70 tonnes per hectare cured rhizomes. With respect to quality in terms of curcumin content, Suroma (PTS-24), Suvarna (PCT-8) and Suguna (PCT- 13) were superior (9.23%, 8.68%, 8.40%, respectively). The genotypes mango ginger, PCT-8, PCT-13, Prabha, Pratibha and Alleppey were found to be short duration types, maximum percentage of foliar disease intensity was recorded in all the PCT series viz., PCT-8, PCT-13 and PCT-14. There was significant variation in turmeric cv. Salem to organics and inorganic fertilizers for growth, yield and quality attributes. Application of RDF (180:90:90 NPK kg/ha) + FYM (25 t/ha) recorded maximum plant height (67.20 cm), number of leaves (15.55/plant), number of tillers (3.43/plant), maximum dry matter accumulation (7.19 t/ha), higher fresh rhizome yield (34.98 t/ha), maximum curing percentage (20.33) and higher cured yield (7.11 t/ha). Higher curcumin content was recorded by application of RDF + FeS04 (10 kg/ha) and RDF+ZnS04 (10 kg/ha) (4.60% and 4.40%, respectively). Higher cost benefit ratio was recorded in RDF + FYM (25 t/ha) 1:3.03) followed by sheep manure (5 t/ha) (1:2.86), vermicompost (2.5 t/ha) (1:2.80). Whereas lower benefit cost ratio (1:2.27) was recorded in FYM (25 t/ha)."en_US
dc.identifier.citationNo. of references 70en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810113342
dc.keywordsEVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF TURMERIC AND RESPONSE OF TURMERIC CV. SALEM TO ORGANICS AND INORGANIC FERTILISERSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.pages163en_US
dc.publisherUNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES GKVK, DHARWADen_US
dc.research.problemEVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF TURMERIC AND RESPONSE OF TURMERIC CV. SALEM TO ORGANICS AND INORGANIC FERTILISERSen_US
dc.subSpices, Plantation and Medicinal and Aromatic Plantsen_US
dc.subjectnullen_US
dc.themeEVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF TURMERIC AND RESPONSE OF TURMERIC CV. SALEM TO ORGANICS AND INORGANIC FERTILISERSen_US
dc.these.typeM.Scen_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF TURMERIC AND RESPONSE OF TURMERIC CV. SALEM TO ORGANICS AND INORGANIC FERTILISERSen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Collections
Thesis
Load more