Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

19901
Reset filters
Author: Parvathy, S × End date: 1991 × Thesis Type: M.Sc ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Determination of constants in uniform flow formula for small discharges in open channels
    (Department of Land and Water Resources and Conservation Engineering, Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur, 1990) Parvathy, S; KAU; George, T P
    An attempt was made to find out the constants in the general uniform flow formula for small discharges less than 10 1/s in cement lined and earthen channels. These constants were compared with the constants in the well known and widely used uniform flow formulae such as Manning’s and Chezy’s equation and checked their validity for small channels. Experiments were conducted for different discharges varying from 1 to 9 1/s and for different slopes of 1/2000, 1/3000, 1/4000 and 1/5000 in cement lined and earthen channels. With the help of a computer, analysis was made to establish a relationship between velocity v, hydraulic radius R and slope S. The expirical equation obtained are In cement lined channel V = 9.199 R0.7591 S0.1103 i.e. V = 1/0.1087 R0.7591 S0.1103 In earthen channel V = 47.2286 R0.844 S0.307 i.e. V = 1/0.0212 R0.844 S0.307 From the comparison of actual velocity with velocity obtained by using Manning’s equation, it was found that Manning’s equation was not applicable to small channels having discharges less than 10 1/s. In both the channels, actual velocity was roughly two times greater than the Manning’s velocity. The average ratio of actual and computed velocity using the best fit equations and the coefficient of determinations in the two cases were near unity. Hence the best fit equations obtained in the study are recommended for the design of small channels. Manning fixed the value of exponent of S as 0.5 based on some theoretical assumptions. So it was decided to find the value of n and the exponent of R in both the channels by fixing the value of exponent of S as 0.5. The equations obtained are In cement lined channel V = 1/0.00428 R0.7827 S0.5 In earthen channel V = 1/0.00408 R0.8696 S0.5 These equations were good but their reliability were less than that of the previous equations.Since Manning’s equation is an university accepted form, comparison was made between the recommended n values and the n values obtained in the study by fixing the value of exponent of R and S as 0.67 and 0.5 respectively. The equations obtained are In cement lined channel V = 1/0.00609 R0.67 S0.5 In earthen channel V = 1/0.00778 R0.67 S0.5 Though the reliability of these equations were comparatively less than the earlier cases, it gave reasonably good results. So these equations are also recommended for the design of small channels with different n values for cement lined and earthen channels. Chezy’s constant C was determined from the best fit equations by fixing the value of exponent of R and S as 0.5. The equations obtained in two channels are In cement lined channel V = 94.91√RS In earthen channel V = 74.771√RS These C values obtained are recommended for the design of small channels in Chezy’s equation than the C values obtained from Manning’s and Kutter’s equations using Manning’s recommended n values. Soil in which earthen channel was constructed was classified based on texture. Since the soil was sandy loam, the best fit equation obtained in earthen channel is applicable only for sandy loam soil.