Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20141
Reset filters
Author: KAU × Author: Shahla, Karuthedath × Start date: 2011 ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Development and quality evaluation of nutribars
    (Department of Home Science, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2014) Shahla, Karuthedath; KAU; Suman, K T
    The present study entitled “Development and quality evaluation of nutribars” was aimed to develop nutribars with cereal flakes, dehydrated fruits, nuts and functional ingredients and to evaluate the physical, chemical, nutritional, organoleptic and shelf life qualities of the developed nutribars. Nutribars were standardised in 24 different combinations based on jaggery honey mix and glucose syrup in which cereal flakes formed the main ingredient. To find out the most appropriate combination for the preparation of nutribars, the treatments were evaluated for various organoleptic qualities. Nutribars prepared using glucose syrup had comparatively better mean scores for different quality attributes than nutribars prepared with jaggery honey mix. Based on the organoleptic scores, six treatments namely T3 (corn flakes in jaggery honey), T6 (rice flakes and corn flakes in jaggery honey mix), T8 (wheat flakes and corn flakes in jaggery honey mix), T12 (wheat flakes in glucose syrup), T16 (rice flakes and corn flakes in glucose syrup) and T20 (corn flakes and oat flakes in glucose syrup) were selected for further studies. The selected nutribars were prepared and packed in polyethylene and laminated aluminium pouches under vacuum. After packaging, the products were stored under ambient conditions for a period of six months and evaluated for various quality parameters during storage. The hardness of the product was evaluated initially. The chemical, nutritional and microbiological qualities of the products were evaluated initially, after third and sixth month of storage. The organoleptic qualities and peroxide value of the products were assessed initially and at monthly intervals for a period of six months. The moisture content of nutribars increased gradually with advancement in days of storage. The increase in moisture content of nutribars packed in laminated aluminium pouches was lower than the nutribars packed in polyethylene pouches. An increase in total sugar and reducing sugar content was observed in the nutribars stored in both packages during storage. The jaggery honey mix based nutribars had comparatively higher total and reducing sugar content than glucose syrup based ones. The protein, fat, fibre, starch, thiamine, calcium, iron, sodium, potassium and zinc content of nutribars decreased during six months of storage. The mean score for overall acceptability of nutribars decreased during storage. The nutribars had mean score above 7.0 in laminated aluminium pouches and in polyethylene pouches at the end of storage. Nutribars packed in laminated aluminium pouches retained its original qualities than polyethylene packed samples up to fourth month of storage. Later much difference in mean scores for the overall acceptability were not noticed with respect to packages. Based on organoleptic qualities, the nutribars prepared with corn flakes in jaggery honey mix (T3) was the most acceptable combination followed by T12 prepared with wheat flakes and T16 prepared with rice flakes and corn flakes in glucose syrup. The nutribars were evaluated initially, after third and sixth month for bacteria, yeast and mold for a period of six months. The bacteria, yeast and mold were not detected initially. An increase in bacterial and yeast count was noticed after third and of storage in all the products. Compared to nutribars packed in polyethylene pouches, microbial count was lower in nutribars packed in laminated aluminium pouches.