Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

2021 - 20222
Reset filters
Subject: Silviculture and Agroforestry × End date: 2023 × Start date: 2021 × Type: Thesis × Thesis Type: M.Sc ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    On-farm evaluation of selected cereal fodders in prominent land use systems of Kerala
    (2021) Shahina, N N; Asha K Raj
    The field study entitled “On-farm evaluation of selected cereal fodders in prominent land use systems of Kerala” was carried out as two separate experiments in homegarden and coconut garden with livestock component in Madakkathara panchayath, Thrissur, Kerala during 2020-21. The study aimed to evaluate the forage yield and nutritive value of three cereal fodders viz., maize, sorghum, and bajra in major land use systems of Kerala viz., homegarden, coconut garden, and under open conditions with full sunlight. The study also assessed the relative performance of cereal fodders with hybrid napier, the popular fodder grass in Kerala. In each system, the treatments were laid out in Randomized Block Design replicated three times. The crops were cultivated during two different seasons viz., rabi and summer. In homegarden trial, all the crops established well in homegarden and contiguous open areas. In general, the growth parameters of crops were better in the open field. Among crops, maize showed better growth followed by hybrid napier, bajra, and sorghum. In open field, maize recorded significantly higher cumulative green fodder yield (93.27 Mg ha-1 in rabi and 93.32 Mg ha-1 in summer) followed by hybrid napier (70.42 Mg ha-1 in rabi and 79.20 Mg ha-1 in summer), while in homegarden, the yield of maize (57.16 Mg ha-1 and 73.50 Mg ha-1 ) and hybrid napier (60.42 Mg ha-1 in rabi and 73.51 Mg ha-1 in summer) was on par. The productivity of sorghum and bajra was poor in both land use systems. The shade tolerance of fodder grasses in homegarden is in the order; hybrid napier>maize >bajra >sorghum. Dry fodder yields also followed a similar trend. The fodder production was generally higher during the summer season than in rabi. The per day productivity was higher for bajra and maize in both land use systems. The PAR availability in homegarden as compared to open conditions during rabi and summer season was 31.72 and 49.18 percent respectively. Considering the quality aspects of fodder, the crude protein content was higher and crude fibre content was lower in homegarden than in open field, whereas xvii the dry matter and ash content showed the reverse trend. In homegarden and open field, maize had more crude protein content followed by hybrid napier, bajra, and sorghum during both seasons. The order of CF content in homegarden was in the order; maize maize > bajra > sorghum. The dry fodder yields also followed a similar trend. Per day productivity of fodder grasses was noticed more in open contiguous areas as compared to coconut garden. The maximum per day productivity was obtained by bajra and maize in both land management systems. The mean daily PAR transmittance in coconut garden during the rabi and summer season was 55.74 and 56.83 percent respectively. In the second experiment also, the crude protein content was higher and crude fibre content lower in coconut garden, whereas the dry matter and ash content observed more in open fields. In coconut garden, maize had more crude protein content followed by hybrid napier and the crude fibre content was minimum in maize. The ash content was also maximum in maize. The grasses in the coconut garden showed more N content and were recorded highest in maize. The P and K content recorded higher values in open conditions than in coconut garden. The P concentration was maximum in hybrid napier, while K content was highest in fodder bajra. In both systems, maize recorded the highest B: C ratio followed by hybrid napier. xviii Thus, the study indicates that cereal fodder, maize can be successfully and cost effectively cultivated in partially shaded tree-based systems like homegardens and coconut gardens with minimal yield loss. In comparison, yield reduction was higher under homegarden with low PAR transmission (41 percent) than that of coconut garden with higher light availability (56 percent). The study also indicated that maize outperformed hybrid napier both quantitatively and qualitatively under coconut garden with more availability of light, whereas it showed a comparable response in homegarden with intense shade indicating higher shade tolerance of hybrid napier. Bajra showed moderate performance under shady situations whereas sorghum yielded very poor results.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Growth and productivity as function of site quality and age in teak plantations of Nilambur, Kerala
    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Forestry, Vellanikkara, 2022) Sankar Thampuran, M V; KAU; Kunhamu, T K
    Teak has been one among the principal timber species widely used across the world due to its matchless combination of qualities. Kerala has around 76,710 ha of pure teak and 14,440 ha of teak with softwood plantation making up 49.08 and 9.24 per cent respectively of the total plantation area in the state. Despite having the largest share of plantations under teak, the productivity of teak plantations of Kerala are under serious decline and has been a matter of concern in the scientific parlance. Evidences suggest that even in Nilambur, the celebrated land of teak, there has been large scale decline in productivity of teak plantations. However, quantitative aspects of the productivity of teak and the drivers of changes especially in the best teak growing region in Kerala such as Nilambur, is lacking. In this backdrop, a field study entitled “Growth and productivity as function of site quality and age in teak plantations of Nilambur, Kerala” was conducted in selected plantations from Nilambur North and Nilambur South Forest Divisions. The plantations were selected based on the information available from Kerala Forest Department on their age and site quality. Four site qualities (SQ I, SQ II, SQ III and SQ IV) and five age classes (10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50 and 50+) were considered for the study forming a total of 20 plantations (4 site qualities x 5 age classes = 20 plantations). Five sample plots, each of size 24m x 24m were laid out randomly in each of the selected plantations and parameters like total tree height, bole height, diameter at breast height, diameter at crown point and crown width were measured in the field. Also, soil sampling was done in four plantations of different site qualities falling in the mature age class of 40-50. For this, 1 m deep soil pits were dug, one each inside the plantation and in the respective contiguous treeless open. Sampling was done in five depth intervals (0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60- 80 and 80-100 cm). Thus, a total of 120 samples of soil were collected for analysis. The collected soil was analysed for physical properties like bulk density and particle size distribution/ texture and chemical properties like pH, total Nitrogen, organic Carbon content, available Phosphorus and exchangeable Potassium following standard procedures. 122 The results showed that among the plantations studied in Nilambur, the SQ I plantations showed dominance in all growth parameters of teak while a predictable pattern of change was lacking across the subsequent site qualities. There was large heterogeneity among the plantations in terms of management that had a confounding effect on the potential exploitation of the site resources for optimal growth of teak. Many of the plantations had high density of invaded miscellaneous trees which have increased the effective density and seriously affected the growth of teak. The density of miscellaneous trees varied from 0 to 694 trees per hectare among the studied plantations. The competition with miscellaneous species has created large scale variability within each stand in growth attributes. Normal distribution of diameter classes was observable in the plantations studied due to high effective density. Stand density being a critical factor that decide productivity and product quality in teak plantations, the observed variability in productivity could be attributed to poor adherence to proper density regulation. Also, the productivity of the plantations has been considerably influenced by poor adherence to timely plantation management practices. The Mean Annual Increment varied from 0.56 to 8.70 m3ha-1yr-1 among all the plantations studied. On comparing with the All-India yield table for teak, the plantations showed growth and productivity estimates that were quite different from their assigned site quality. In the age class 40-50, the SQ I plantation showed a height that was corresponding to SQ III according to the yield table, while the SQ IV plantation height corresponded to the SQ II. All the observed soil parameters with in the experimental plots were well within the range required for the optimal growth of teak. However, except for SQ1, we could not observe any predictable change in soil properties across the remaining site qualities. The Bulk density of soil increased with depth, both inside and outside the plantations. The rate of increase of bulk density was higher in the treeless open areas compared to the plantations. Th soil texture remained as sandy loam or loamy sand for all the analysed soil samples. The soil pH varied from 5.17 to 5.98 between the soil samples that were analysed. The organic Carbon content in various layers of plantation soil varied from 0.58 to 2.07 %. Total Nitrogen varied from 0.077 to 123 0.223 %. Available Phosphorus varied from 2.10 to 17.33 kgha-1. Exchangeable potassium varied from 51.82 to 488.30 kgha-1. Attempts to relate the soil properties with the site productivity could not derive meaningful correlations suggesting that the productivity decline might be an effect of poor management rather than depletion of nutrient status. The study suggests that there is an urgent need to revisit and reassess the site quality of the plantations in Nilambur and to give utmost concern for adhering to scientific stand management in timebound manner for deriving optimal productivity from teak plantations of Nilambur.