Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20191
Reset filters
Subject: Post Harvest Technology × Author: Swathi, B S × End date: 2019 × Start date: 2019 × Thesis Type: M.Sc ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Development of functional jackfruit pasta
    (Department of Post Harvest Technology, College of Agriculture,Vellayani, 2019) Swathi, B S; KAU; Geetha lekshmi, P R
    The present study entitled “Development of functional jackfruit pasta” was carried out at Department of Post Harvest Technology, College of Agriculture, Vellayani during the period 2017-2019 with the objective to develop functional pasta from jackfruit bulb and seed flour enriched with vegetables and to study the storage stability. Jackfruit bulb and seed flour were used for the development of jackfruit pasta in different combinations along with cassava flour replacing a portion of refined flour contributing to 65% of total ingredients. The remaining 35% of total ingredients were kept as constant with refined flour, soy flour and starch. Jackfruit pasta developed were subjected to analysis for cooking quality, nutritional, textural and sensory parameters. Cooking quality characters viz. cooking loss, water absorption, swelling index and cooking time were analyzed for jackfruit pasta and cooking loss ranged from 14.16% to 21.97%. The lowest cooking loss (14.16%) was recorded for jackfruit pasta developed with 15% jackfruit bulb flour, 15% jackfruit seed flour and 35% cassava flour. Water absorption and swelling index of jackfruit pasta increased with increase in seed flour concentration and the highest water absorption (1.34 g g-1) and swelling index (2.86%) was observed for 50% jackfruit seed flour and 15% cassava flour combination. Cooking time of developed jackfruit pasta ranged from 6.12 min to 7.14 min with no significant difference among the treatments. Nutritional parameters viz. starch, total sugar, reducing sugar, protein, carotenoids, crude fibre and antioxidant activity were analyzed for raw as well as cooked jackfruit pasta which varied with jackfruit bulb and seed flour concentration. Starch and protein content of jackfruit pasta increased with increase in seed flour and cassava flour concentration and total sugar, reducing sugar and carotenoids increased with bulb flour concentration. Sensory evaluation of developed jackfruit pasta exhibited significant difference in consumer acceptance for the treatment combinations. Based on cooking quality, nutritional, textural and sensory parameters the three best treatments viz. jackfruit bulb flour (10%) + jackfruit seed flour (30%) + cassava flour (25%), jackfruit bulb flour (25%) + jackfruit seed flour (25%) + cassava flour (15%) and jackfruit bulb flour (20%) + jackfruit seed flour (20%) + cassava flour (25%) were selected for further studies. The best three jackfruit pasta combinations selected were incorporated with three vegetables viz. carrot, beetroot and red amaranthus @ 5 and 10 % and the developed functional jackfruit pasta were subjected to cooking quality, nutritional, textural and sensory analyses. Cooking loss, swelling index and cooking time did not show significant difference among the combinations. Water absorption of vegetable incorporated jackfruit pasta @ 10% recorded the highest value of 1.49 g g-1 and 1.68g g-1 for the combination of 10% jackfruit bulb flour, 30% jackfruit seed flour and 25% cassava flour with 10% amaranthus and beetroot respectively while it was 1.53g g-1 for the combination of jackfruit bulb flour (25%) + jackfruit seed flour (25%) + cassava flour (15%) with 10% carrot. Carrot incorporated functional jackfruit pasta with 25% jackfruit bulb and seed flour, 15% cassava flour and 10% carrot recorded the highest consumer acceptance followed by beetroot and amaranthus based functional jackfruit pasta with 10% jackfruit bulb flour, 30% jackfruit seed flour, 25% cassava flour and 10% respective vegetables. The selected vegetable based functional jackfruit pasta were stored at room temperature and storage stability studies on cooking quality, nutritional and sensory attributes revealed that there was no significant change in qualities during storage and no microbial load was found till the end of storage period of four months. In the present study, combinations for development of vegetable based functional jackfruit pasta were standardized as 25% jackfruit bulb flour, 25% jackfruit seed flour, 15% cassava flour and 10% carrot for carrot based functional jackfruit pasta and the combination of jackfruit bulb flour (10%) + jackfruit seed flour (30%) + cassava flour (25%) and 10% beetroot or amaranthus for beetroot and amaranthus based functional jackfruit pasta. Storage stability studies on cooking quality, nutritional and sensory attributes revealed that there was no significant change in qualities during storage and no microbial load was found till the end of storage period of four months.