Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20201
Reset filters
Subject: Plant Pathology × Author: KAU × Author: Sumbula, V × End date: 2020 × Start date: 2020 ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Management of early blight disease of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under protected cultivation
    (Department of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2020) Sumbula, V; KAU; Sainamole Kurian, P
    Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most remunerative and widely grown vegetables all over the world. With the coordinated efforts of central and state governments, protected cultivation of tomato is now gaining popularity in Kerala. Despite being a versatile crop adapted to various agroclimatic regions and seasons, cultivation of tomato is constrained by various fungal, bacterial and viral diseases. Among the fungal diseases, early blight caused by Alternaria solani is the most common, destructive and widespread in all the tomato growing tracts. Fungicides and bioagents are commonly used to manage plant pathogens. But little is known about their effects on the non-target microbial communities that inhabit inside and outside the plant. Hence, it has become necessary to consider the effect of different fungicidal and bioagent treatments on target and non-target microbial communities while formulating disease management strategies. So, the present investigation was carried out with the objectives to formulate suitable management strategies against early blight disease of tomato under protected cultivation and to assess their impact on culturable and non-culturable microflora associated with the plant. Isolation of the pathogen from infected tomato leaf samples revealed the association of the fungus, Alternaria sp. and its pathogenicity was established by inoculating on threemonth- old tomato seedlings. Symptoms observed on leaves, shoot and fruits were almost same under both natural and artificial conditions. Cultural and morphological characters of pathogen was studied on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Initially, pathogen produced greenish brown mycelium and later turned to grey colour. Hyphae are septate and the colony has aerial topography and irregular rough growth patterns with concentric zonation. Sporulation was observed after six days of incubation and conidiophores were straight or flexuous brown to olivaceous brown in colour. The conidia are solitary straight or muriform or oblong, pale or olivaceous brown, length 40-110 μm and 7-15 μm thick with 2-8 transverse and 0-3 longitudinal septa. The cultural and morphological characters of the pathogen completely fit into the description of Alternaria solani by Alexopoulos et al. (1996). Hence, it is confirmed that the symptom observed on tomato leaves are those of early blight disease caused by A. solani. In vitro evaluation of fungicides and bioagents showed complete inhibition of the pathogen with propineb (0.1%, 0.2% & 0.3%), hexaconazole (0.05%, 0.1% & 0.15%), iprodione + carbendazim (0.1%, 0.2% & 0.3%), difenoconazole (0.075%), Trichoderma viride (KAU), T. viride (PGPM mix), T. harzianum (PGPM mix) and plant growth promoting microbial consortium (PGPM mix of KAU). Among the bacterial antagonists, Bacillus subtilis (endophyte from cocoa) showed maximum growth inhibition of the pathogen. All the three bioagents recorded earliness in seed germination and enhanced seedling vigour compared to the fungicidal treatments and control. The results of field experiment under polyhouse and rain shelter conditions showed that all the treatments are superior to control in early blight disease management, of which, spraying of iprodione + carbendazim (0.2%) and propineb (0.2%) were the best among fungicides and PGPM mix application was the most efficient among bioagents. Moreover, the highest yield was recorded from iprodione + carbendazim treated plants. Biocontrol treated plants showed better performance in overall plant vigour of which PGPM mix application was the most effective. Residue analysis showed that degradation rate of fungicides was more under polyhouse condition. Analysis of population of phylloplane and endophytic microflora proved that there was drastic reduction in microbial population after spraying with chemical fungicides whereas population increased after bioagent application. The study on survival of bioagents on tomato phylloplane revealed that both Pseudomonas fluorescens and T. viride, survived on leaf surface up to 15 days after foliar application. Analysis of fungicidal residue on tomato fruits revealed that, the degradation of fungicides was faster in polyhouse compared to rain shelter. Metagenomic analysis of microbial diversity on tomato leaves revealed that spraying of chemical fungicides reduces microbial population and diversity while bioagent application enhances the same. However, microbial community structure was changed in both cases. This study also enlightened the new mode of action for fungicides and bioagents besides their direct effect that is shifting the microbial community structure so that it provides greater resistance against the pathogen. Interestingly, metagenomic results also showed association of Cladosporium, Corynespora, Pseudocercospora along with early blight pathogen Alternaria on tomato leaves that otherwise remain undetected. Another important observation was Clostridium in tomato leaf samples except in PGPM mix treatment, suggesting the possibility of plants as alternate host for major human and animal bacterial pathogens. Hence, considering the effects of treatments on per cent disease severity both under polyhouse and rain shelter condition, residue analysis, phylloplane and endophytic microbial enumeration study and metagenomics analysis of microbial diversity, the present study recommends spraying of propineb (0.2%) as the best treatment among the tested fungicides and spraying of PGPM mix among biocontrol agents for the management of early blight disease of tomato under protected cultivation. Further system-level analysis of the complex interaction that governs outcomes among community members in the context of the plant host is required, in order to identify microbial interaction and selection processes for beneficial communities at different concentrations of fungicides and pathogen pressures.