Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

19881
Reset filters
Subject: Plant Breeding × Author: KAU × Author: Rema Bai, N × End date: 1988 × Start date: 1988 × Type: Thesis × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Genetic analysis of brown planthopper resistance in rice
    (Department of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 1988) Rema Bai, N; KAU; Gopinathan Nair, V
    The Brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stal), has become a serious threat to rice production throughout Asia. Very extensive losses have occurred in India, Indonesia, and the Phylippines. The most severe outbreak in India occurred in Kerala during 1973-74 in ‘Kole’ lands of Trichur district and ‘Kuttanad’ area of Kottayam and Alleppey districts. Although insecticides provide effective control, this approach is expensive and creates problems of environmental pollution. Resistant varieties can provide protection and insurance against this insect pest at no extra cost and with no danger from chemical residues. Very little work has been done in Kerala to identify sources of resistance to the local biotype of BPH and on the genetic basis of BPH resistance. The major objectives of the present investigation were to identify sources of resistance to BPH and to conduct genetic analysis and understand the mode of inheritance of BPH resistance. One hundred and nine rice types were studied for their reaction to BPH through the bulk seedling test at the seedling stage and tiller test and honeydew experiment at the tillering stage. Out of them 41 were found to be resistant, 22 moderately resistant, 13 moderately susceptible and 33 highly susceptible. In the tiller test, 31 out of the 41 resistant varieties were resistant, nine moderately resistant and one moderately susceptible. The thirty one types found resistant under tiller test were subjected to honeydew experiment, out of which 30 were found to be resistant and one was moderately resistant. 2 The inheritance of resistance was studied in eight types selected from among the 30 types proved to be resistant in all the three tests. They were crossed with the susceptible variety TN1 and the F1, F2 and F3 generations were studied by bulk seedling test, tiller test and honeydew experiment. F1 seedlings were also screened by bulk seedling test, tiller test and honeydew experiment. The F2 progenies were screened by the bulk seedling test and tiller test. The F3 seedlings were screened by bulk seedling test only. The F2 and F3 progenies were scored separately as resistant and susceptible types and the observed segregation ratios were tested against the expected by applying the test of goodness of fit. The F1s of all the eight crosses were resistant indicating that resistance in each of the eight types was governed by dominant gene. The F2 populations of all the eight crosses segregated in the ratio of 3 resistant : 1 susceptible indicating that a single dominant gene governed resistance in each of the eight resistant types. F3 breeding behaviour of the nine F2 resistant plants from each of the eight crosses confirmed the monogenic control of resistance over susceptibility. Two dominant genes Bph1 and Bph3 were identified at IRRI (Bph1 in variety Mudgo and Bph3 in RatuHeenati). In the present study, Mudgo containing Bph1 and RatuHeenati with Bph3 gene were not resistant. Hence it is assumed that the dominant resistant gene identified in the present study is neither Bph1 nor Bph3. 3 Diallele crosses were made between six resistant types selected based on diverse origin. The F1 and F2 progenies of the 15 combinations were studied to get information on the allelie relationship between the resistance genes. The F1 progenies of all the crosses were resistant and the F2 progenies were homogeneous for resistance. This lead to the conclusion that all the six types have the same dominant gene for resistance. All the six resistant types were isogenic and hence all of them are expected to carry a dominant gene for BPH resistance other than Bph1 and Bph3. The present study has thus made available several types resistant to the local biotype of BPH and also enabled the location of a new dominant gene conferring resistance to this biotype. These results and the materials made available can form the basis for a more effective breeding approach for BPH resistance in this region.