Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20191
Reset filters
Subject: Plant Breeding × Author: Ashni Varghese × Author: KAU × Thesis Type: M.Sc ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Development of stabilised population of cowpea segregants(Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.) with high protein content and grain yield
    (Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2019) Ashni Varghese; KAU; Jiji Joseph
    Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is an important pulse crop providing good source of protein and often referred to as poor man’s meat. It is a versatile crop, of which seeds are utilised as pulse, green pods as vegetable, leaves as forage and helps in restoring soil fertility. Many reports have indicated protein content of more than 30 per cent in certain cowpea genotypes, but at the cost of yield. Hence, the present study was proposed to develop cultures with high grain yield and protein content. The present study was conducted at Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Horticulture during 2017-2019. Twenty three lines with high yield and protein content in the F3 generation of two cowpea crosses H10 (Anaswara X PKB 3) and H11 (Anaswara X PKB 4) identified in previous studies formed the working material. These lines were evaluated in F4, F5 and F6 generations and pedigree selection was performed to select superior plants. Observations were recorded on 12 characters viz. plant height, number of branches, days to first flowering, days to first harvest, days to last harvest, number of pods per plant, length of pod, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, hundred seed weight, grain yield per plant and protein content. The F4 generation of both the crosses exhibited lower mean value for most of the characters than the parent Anaswara, but recorded moderate to high variance and range. Higher mean value was observed for days to first flowering, first harvest, last harvest, number of branches and protein content. Genetic parameters indicated that GCV was moderate for length of pod, number of seeds per pod, and hundred seed weight and high for grain yield per plant. High heritability coupled with moderate to high genetic advance was recorded for number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, hundred seed weight, and grain yield. Correlation studies in F4 generation revealed that grain yield was positively correlated with plant height, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, length of pod, pod weight, number of seeds per pod and test weight. There was non-significant correlation between grain yield and seed protein content. Further path analysis confirmed that high positive direct effect on grain yield was given by pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and hundred seed weight. Based on these observations, characters like number of pods per plant, hundred seed weight and number of seeds per pod were simultaneously included along with grain yield for setting selection criteria to select superior individual plants. Based on these set criteria, 13 individual plants from cross H10 and 10 plants from cross H11 were selected and forwarded to F5 generation. In F5 generation, mean values for number of branches, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and protein content were higher than that of Anaswara with sufficient variance and range. GCV was moderate for number of branches, length of pod, pod weight, hundred seed weight and grain yield per plant. High heritability with moderate to high genetic advance was recorded for number of pods per plant, length of pod, pod weight, number of seeds per pod, hundred seed weight and grain yield. Based on the segregation pattern observed, the plants were grouped into two different categories - one with medium long pods and small seeds closely packed within the pod and the other type with long fleshy pods and bold seeds. Hence, separate selection criteria was developed for both the types comprising of characters like number of pods, number of seeds per pod, pod length, hundred seed weight, grain yield and protein content. Based on these set criteria, five individual plants from cross H10 (one type 1 and four type 2) and 17 plants from cross H11 (five type 1 and twelve type 2) were selected and forwarded to F6 generation. In F6 generation, mean value was higher than Anaswara for number of pods per plant but lower for plant height, days to first flowering, days to first harvest, days to last harvest, pod length and hundred seed weight. For other characters, mean value was comparable to Anaswara. Moderate GCV value was recorded for length of pod, pod weight and hundred seed weight. High heritability with high genetic advance was recorded for length of pod, pod weight and hundred seed weight. Separate selection criteria was developed for the two categories of plants and total five individual plants were selected, one from cross H10 and four from cross H11. The selected plants from F6 generation were subjected to organoleptic evaluation to find its suitability to be used for vegetable purpose. Three plants of type 2 and one plant from type 1 were found promising. The identified lines, H11-3.9-1-7-13-7, H11-3.9-1-1-18-13, H11-49.7-1-8-10-15, H10-71-16-1-9-15-12, and H11-2-20-3-14-16-12 can be evaluated in replicated yield trials and tested for stability over locations and seasons