Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20192
Reset filters
Subject: Fruit Science × Author: Pooja Shree, S × End date: 2022 × Type: Thesis × Thesis Type: M.Sc ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Nutrient management for pineapple (Ananas cosmosus L.)C.V. Amritha
    (Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture Vellanikkara, 2019) Pooja Shree, S; KAU; Ajith Kumar, K
    Amritha, is the pineapple hybrid released from the Pineapple Research Centre, Vellanikkara, under KAU. The present study entitled “Nutrient management for pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) cv. Amritha” was conducted for standardizing the optimum nutrient doses for ensuring high productivity. When grown under the existing POP recommendation of KAU the fruit weight was varying from 0.5 - 1 kg per plant. Therefore, there is a need to develop optimum nutrient doses for ensuring higher productivity of pineapple cv. Amritha. Experiment was conducted with six treatments viz., T1 - POP recommendation of KAU (8:4:8 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T2 - Modified based on soil test results (9.39:11.45:11.36 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T3 - 25 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (11.7:14.31:14.31 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T4 - 50 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (14.08: 17.17: 17.03 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T5 - 75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (16.4:20.03:19.13 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), and T6 - adhoc organic POP. Length of ‘D’ leaf showed significant difference among the treatments after eight months of planting. T6 recorded the maximum length of ‘D’ leaf (44.3 cm) and was on par with T1 (41.1 cm) and T5 (40.9 cm). This was continued in ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth months after planting. Significant difference was observed in ‘D’ leaf area among the treatments after nine months of planting. T6 recorded the maximum ‘D’ leaf area at tenth (113.77 cm2), eleventh (128.70 cm2) and twelfth (155.20 cm2) months after planting and was significantly superior over other treatments. Application of different levels of nutrients had no significant effect on plant height, number of leaves per plant, breadth of ‘D’ leaf, leaf area index and leaf production rate. Treatments, T5 and T6 took 6 ¹/₂ months after planting to attain physiological maturity whereas, other treatments attained physiological maturity at a period of seven months after planting. Days for initiation of flowering was minimum in T5 (39.2 days) and was significantly different from other treatments. In case of days for 50 per cent flowering, T5 recorded the minimum value (47.2 days) and was on par with T4 (49.4 days). Significant difference was observed among the treatments for fruit weight and was highest in T5 (0.985 kg). The maximum length, girth and breadth of fruit was recorded in T5 (14.15 cm), (30.79 cm) and (30.33 cm) respectively. In case of length/breadth ratio T5 (0.48) recorded the highest value which was on par with T6 (0.46). Higher taper ratio values were recorded by T3 (1.041) and T2 (1.040). With respect to the yield per hectare, maximum value (51.99 t/ha) was recorded by T5 which was significantly superior. T5 recorded the highest peel weight (105.74 g), pulp weight (0.402 kg) and crown weight (118.54 g). The minimum peel/pulp ratio was observed in T5 (0.26). There was no significant difference among treatments for days for fruit maturity, harvest index, root:shoot ratio, crop duration and shelf life. On evaluating the quality parameters of fruits, TSS was found to be highest in T5 (15.30 ˚Brix) and was on par with T4 (14.60 ˚Brix). In case of other parameters like titratable acidity, total sugars, reducing sugars, non reducing sugars, sugar/acid ratio, fibre content and ascorbic acid content, the treatments were found to be non significant. The overall sensory score was found to be highest in T6 (69.18) and was followed by T5 (64.12). The highest B:C ratio was calculated for T5 (4.59). Analysis of soil after the harvest of the crop revealed that the values for soil pH, soil EC, organic carbon, available N, P and K were found to be elevated. N, P and K content in the plant and fruit had no significant difference. In the present study early flowering was observed in T5 (75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results) which in turn resulted in early fruit set and harvesting in the treatment. Highest fruit weight T5 (0.98 kg) and yield per hectare (51.99 t/ha) was also recorded in T5 (75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results). On sensory evaluation, Adhoc organic POP (T6) was found to be superior and was followed by T5.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Nutrient management for pineapple (Ananas cosmosus L.)cv. Amritha
    (Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2019) Pooja Shree, S; KAU; Ajith Kumar, K
    Amritha, is the pineapple hybrid released from the Pineapple Research Centre, Vellanikkara, under KAU. The present study entitled “Nutrient management for pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) cv. Amritha” was conducted for standardizing the optimum nutrient doses for ensuring high productivity. When grown under the existing POP recommendation of KAU the fruit weight was varying from 0.5 - 1 kg per plant. Therefore, there is a need to develop optimum nutrient doses for ensuring higher productivity of pineapple cv. Amritha. Experiment was conducted with six treatments viz., T1 - POP recommendation of KAU (8:4:8 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T2 - Modified based on soil test results (9.39:11.45:11.36 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T3 - 25 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (11.7:14.31:14.31 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T4 - 50 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (14.08: 17.17: 17.03 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), T5 - 75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results (16.4:20.03:19.13 N, P2O5, K2O g plant⁻¹), and T6 - adhoc organic POP. Length of ‘D’ leaf showed significant difference among the treatments after eight months of planting. T6 recorded the maximum length of ‘D’ leaf (44.3 cm) and was on par with T1 (41.1 cm) and T5 (40.9 cm). This was continued in ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth months after planting. Significant difference was observed in ‘D’ leaf area among the treatments after nine months of planting. T6 recorded the maximum ‘D’ leaf area at tenth (113.77 cm2), eleventh (128.70 cm2) and twelfth (155.20 cm2) months after planting and was significantly superior over other treatments. Application of different levels of nutrients had no significant effect on plant height, number of leaves per plant, breadth of ‘D’ leaf, leaf area index and leaf production rate. Treatments, T5 and T6 took 6 ¹/₂ months after planting to attain physiological maturity whereas, other treatments attained physiological maturity at a period of seven months after planting. Days for initiation of flowering was minimum in T5 (39.2 days) and was significantly different from other treatments. In case of days for 50 per cent flowering, T5 recorded the minimum value (47.2 days) and was on par with T4 (49.4 days). Significant difference was observed among the treatments for fruit weight and was highest in T5 (0.985 kg). The maximum length, girth and breadth of fruit was recorded in T5 (14.15 cm), (30.79 cm) and (30.33 cm) respectively. In case of length/breadth ratio T5 (0.48) recorded the highest value which was on par with T6 (0.46). Higher taper ratio values were recorded by T3 (1.041) and T2 (1.040). With respect to the yield per hectare, maximum value (51.99 t/ha) was recorded by T5 which was significantly superior. T5 recorded the highest peel weight (105.74 g), pulp weight (0.402 kg) and crown weight (118.54 g). The minimum peel/pulp ratio was observed in T5 (0.26). There was no significant difference among treatments for days for fruit maturity, harvest index, root:shoot ratio, crop duration and shelf life. On evaluating the quality parameters of fruits, TSS was found to be highest in T5 (15.30 ˚Brix) and was on par with T4 (14.60 ˚Brix). In case of other parameters like titratable acidity, total sugars, reducing sugars, non reducing sugars, sugar/acid ratio, fibre content and ascorbic acid content, the treatments were found to be non significant. The overall sensory score was found to be highest in T6 (69.18) and was followed by T5 (64.12). The highest B:C ratio was calculated for T5 (4.59). Analysis of soil after the harvest of the crop revealed that the values for soil pH, soil EC, organic carbon, available N, P and K were found to be elevated. N, P and K content in the plant and fruit had no significant difference. In the present study early flowering was observed in T5 (75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results) which in turn resulted in early fruit set and harvesting in the treatment. Highest fruit weight T5 (0.98 kg) and yield per hectare (51.99 t/ha) was also recorded in T5 (75 per cent higher than the modified POP based on soil test results). On sensory evaluation, Adhoc organic POP (T6) was found to be superior and was followed by T5.