Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

19941
Reset filters
Subject: Agronomy × Author: Thomas, Varghese P × End date: 1994 × Start date: 1994 × Type: Thesis × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Effect of nutrition as Influenced by irrigation on growth and yield of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq)
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 1994) Thomas, Varghese P; KAU; Sreedharan, C
    A field experiment was conducted in the oil palm plantations of the Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI) Research Centre, Palode, Kerala to study the response of mature oil palm to fertilizer and irrigation applications with respect to growth, yield and uptake of nutrients. There were four levels of fertilizers viz: F0- 0:0:0, F1-600: 300: 600, F2- 1200: 600: 1200 and F3-1800: 900: 1800 g N : p20 : k20 palm-1 year-1. The three levels of irrigation were: I0-no irrigation, I1-45 1 palm-1 day-1 and I2-90 1 palm-1 day-1. The 4x3 factorial experiment was laid out in randomised block design with three replications. The study was also envisaged to establish the importance of leaf nutrient ratios of yield group of palms and its application in identifying nutrient limitations through the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) approach in oil palm. The influence of various climatic parameters on yield of oil palm was studied by relating the monthly yield of oil palm in the field experiment with the monthly weather variables as far behind as 42 months before harvest. Fertilizer application of 1200 g N+600 g P2O5+ 1200 g K2O palm-1 year-1 was found to improve the growth characters such as annual leaf production, number of leaves on the crown, dry matter production of leaf, trunk and bunches, total dry matter production and the crop growth rate. Increase in yield attributes such as number of female inflorescences, sex ratio, average single fruit weight and the number of bunches at F2 level contributed to the significantly high FFB yield at F2 level of fertilizer application. Both palm oil and palm kernel oil production were also maximum at F2 level. For the uptake of nutrients N,P and K by palm parts as well as by the palm as a whole, the F2 level of fertilizer application was found to be the optimum. It was observed that 79% of the total uptake of N, 77% of P and 82% of K are removed annually through leaves and bunches from the system. A K-Mg antagonism was also detected in nutrient uptake. The yield of palm was found positively correlated with leaf production, leaf area, net assimilation rate, number of bunches produced, vegetative dry matter, P and K in soil and the total uptake of N, P and K by the palm. Both net income and benefit cost ratio were also found favorable at F2 level of fertilizer application. Irrigation at I2 level has resulted in increased leaf production, leaflets per leaf, leaf area, leaf dry matter, mesocarp dry matter and the bunch dry matter. Physiological parameters like relative water content, leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, leaf temperature and net photosynthesis were all favourable at I2 level of irrigation. Female flower production, sex ratio, single fruit weight and number of bunches produced were also more in I2 treatment. This has resulted in increasing FFB production at I2 level. Palm oil production was also more at I2 level. Total uptake of N, P, K and Ca were also found to be maximum at I2 level of irrigation. The net profit and benefit cost ratio were also maximum at I2 level. Leaf nutrient ratios of palms in different yield groups: were used to evolve parameters and norms for Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) in oil palm. The range of nutrient ratios within the zones of balance, moderate imbalance and imbalance were determined which were also illustrated through DRIS charts for three nutrient combinations. The DRIS approach was used to evaluate the nutrient balancing of the different treatments of the field. The order of relative importance of the five nutrients was determined using nutrient imbalance index (NII) values as indicated below: K> P> N> Mg> Ca The F2 level of fertilizer application in the experiment was found to be the most balanced among the tested fertilizer levels. The possibility of magnesium becoming a potential limiting nutrient at higher levels of fertilizer application has been brought out from the study. The superiority of balanced nutrition in increasing total dry matter production and bunch yield became evident from the study. The studies on climatic relationship with yield revealed that the pattern of variation in monthly yield remained the same inspite of irrigation throughout the summer months. The relationship of monthly yield of oil palm with monthly climatic parameters was evaluated up to a period 42 months before harvest. When eight climatic parameters were considered together, the influence of these weather parameters at seven specific lag periods viz. 1-4, 9-10, 13-16, 20-23, 25-28, 32-33 and 37-40 were found important for oil palm. Of these the lag 25-28 was found to be the most important as the relationship of climatic parameters with yield at this period was more. Relative humidity, maximum temperature and rainfall were identified as the most important variables influencing palm yield. Using results obtained from regression studies yield prediction models were constituted. It is concluded that yield prediction using the three or more variables is possible for oil palm 26-28 months in advance of harvest. The salient findings from the study is that a fertilizer dose of 1200g N+ 600 g P2O5+ 1200 g K2O palm-1 year-1 and irrigation level of 90 l palm-1 day-1 applied through drip system during the summer months are required to obtain maximum FFB yield from mature oil palm. The order of importance of nutrients for oil palm is determined as K> P> N> Mg> Ca. With the above level of fertilizer application the palms were found to have a more balanced nutrition. However continued application of fertilizers might possibly lead to magnesium deficiency unless corrective measures are adopted. Relative humidity, maximum temperature and rainfall are found to be the most important climatic parameters influencing oil palm yields. The influence of climatic parameters at seven lag periods 1-4, 9-10, 13-16, 20-23, 25-28, 32-33 and 37-40 were found to be more pronounced on palm yield. From these studies it became possible to predict oil palm yields 26-28 months in advance using models based on these weather parameters.