Loading...
Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur
The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively.
Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively.
On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs.
In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc.
During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU).
Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.
Browse
Search Results
ThesisItem Open Access Group marketing system for fruits and vegetables in Kerala(Department of Rural Marketing Management, College of Co operation and Banking Management, Vellanikkara, 2007) Bibin, Mohan; KAU; Philip, SabuThe study entitled “Group marketing system for Fruits and vegetables in Kerala” was undertaken with the following objectives: To analyse the marketing behaviour of commercial fruits and vegetables farmers and to evaluate the structure, conduct and performance of Swasraya Karshaka Samithies (SKSs) promoted by Vegetable and Fruit Promotion Council, Keralam (VFPCK). The study was conducted in Thrissur and Palakkad districts which accounted for the largest volume of business through SKSs. Commercial farmers and traders of fruits and vegetables constituted the population of the study. For the study, five SKSs were selected from each district randomly. From the area of operation of each SKS, ten member farmers who marketed their produce through SKS and five farmers who marketed their produce otherwise were selected randomly to constitute the sample of farmers. Similarly five traders selected from each SKS constituted the sample of traders. Data were collected from the sources through personal interview method by administering separate pre-tested structured schedules to farmers and traders. The data thus obtained were analysed by using bivariate tables, percentages, satisfaction indices, and ranking. Analysis of the socio-economic profile of the farmers revealed that older generation are more interested in farming than younger generation. The analysis also brought out the predominance of men in agriculture, and they possessed vast experience in farming. The results indicate that marginal and small holdings dominate the agricultural sector in the study area. Analysis of the annual income of the farmers showed that the number of farmers with an annual income of Rs.1,00,000 and above was higher among SKS farmers than Non-SKS farmers. The share of income from fruits and vegetables in the total agricultural income was higher for SKS farmers. ‘Better price for the produce’ followed by regular market for the produce, ‘better measurement and grading practices in the market’, ‘feeling of farmers own organisation’ were the most important reasons for farmers to take membership in SKS. Regarding the ownership pattern of cropped land of the farmers, the share of farmers cultivating on leased land was more among the SKS farmers than Non-SKS farmers. The SKS also attracted farmers with larger area under fruits and vegetables cultivation to its fold. The selected farmers depended more on man made sources of water than natural sources for irrigation and the majority of the farmers used either electric pump or diesel pump for irrigation. Majority of the SKS farmers preferred VFPCK as the main source of seeds for cowpea, bittergourd and amaranthus. In the case of nendran the most preferred source of suckers was traders. When the Non-SKS farmers preferred own sources and fellow farmers for the purpose. The main source of suckers of nendran was traders. Analysis of the different varieties of crops preferred by farmers revealed that in the case of nendran farmers in general preferred Mettupalayam, Kottayam and Manjeri varieties. In the case of cowpea Lola was the most preferred of SKS farmers and Non-SKS farmers preferred Lola, Local and Vyjayanthi varieties. Regarding bittergourd when SKS farmers showed a strong preference towards Preethi, Non-SKS farmers mostly preferred Local variety. Arun was the most preferred variety of amaranthus SKS farmers and Kannara Local by Non-SKS farmers. In the case of ivy gourd majority of SKS farmers preferred Sulabha variety while Non-SKS farmers preferred Local variety. The main sources of planting material for farmers were VFPCK, KAU, traders and fellow farmers. KAU was the only institutional agency which supplied all types of planting materials. Out of the four sources of planting materials, KAU was the dearest and VFPCK the cheapest. Majority of the SKS farmers availed credit from commercial banks linked to SKS when majority of the Non-SKS farmers preferred money lenders and traders for their credit needs. The SKS farmers harvested nendran coinciding with the SKS market days. Cowpea, bittergourd and ivy gourd were harvested thrice a week by majority of the SKS farmers. Vast majority of Non-SKS farmers harvested nendran weekly. Majority of the Non-SKS farmers harvested cowpea and amaranthus thrice in a week. In the case of bitter gourd and ivy gourd majority harvested two days in a week. SKS was the prime source of market information to SKS farmers while traders constituted the main source of information to Non-SKS farmers. The SKS farmers were better placed with regard to scientific marketing practices. All the produces except amaranthus and cowpea were graded and sold in SKS. Only nendran and bitter gourd were graded in Non-SKS market. Majority of the SKS farmers used plantation leaves for packing nendran. Plastic bags were used for packing other crops. Majority of the farmers in Non-SKS markets marketed nendran without packing. The main reason for selling the produce outside the SKS market was farm gate collection by the traders. The important means of transportation for SKS farmers was tailed autorikshaw and head load for majority of Non-SKS farmers. Price fluctuation was the only one risk perceived by SKS farmers, while the Non-SKS farmers perceived the risk of unsold produce, physical damage, and default in payment besides price fluctuation. In order to manage the price risk a majority of the SKS farmers sold the produce to the same trader even at a lower price when Non-SKS market sold to other traders. Regarding the realization of credit sales, 90 per cent of the SKS farmers received payment within a week while majority of the Non-SKS farmers received payment within two weeks. Lack of adequate processing and storage facilities were reported as the most serious problems faced by the commercial fruits and vegetables farmers. The SKS farmers were found better trained than Non-SKS farmers. While analyzing the structure of SKS market, it was found that majority of the sample traders were wholesalers. Majority of them had more than five years experience in fruits and vegetables trade. Majority of them had more than five years experience with the SKS. Regarding the admission in SKS, vast majority of the traders found the rules simple. Seasonality analysis of the market for the selected crops disclosed that the farmers especially nendran farmers realized the best price during Onam season as demand outstripped the supply during the season. The SKS market exhibited conditions of ‘slightly concentrated oligopsony’. Market power concentration analysis showed that in Elevenchery, Pariyaram and Thottipal the market power was highly concentrated in top four traders compared to other SKSs.. However the market power was less concentrated in top four traders in markets like Kottayi, Kanjirapuzha, Viyyakurishi and Pazhayannur. Conduct of the SKS market revealed that majority of the traders waited till the close of the market to buy the produce at a lower price as the price used to cool down towards the end of the market. The purchased produce were fed by the traders to the end markets situated far and wide from the SKS. Majority of the traders operated in more than one market. Regarding the management of price risk the traders signed forward contracts with their retailers and regulated their purchase from SKS according to the price and quantity contracted with their customers. The Marketing Efficiency Index for all the selected crops except bittergourd was the highest in SKS market compared to other markets as the marketing cost was the lowest in the SKS market. The farmers were ‘highly satisfied’ and the traders were ‘highly satisfied’ with the working of the SKS market. The VFPCK, through its group based production and marketing approach has been able to give a fillip to the vegetable and fruit cultivation in Kerala. The Swasraya Karshaka Samithies (SKSs) promoted VFPCK have enabled the farmers to enhance their production and productivity through scientific cultivation practices. The SKS market owned and operated by the farmers have enabled the farmers to realise better price for their produce by setting up best trade practices and price discovering mechanism.ThesisItem Open Access Study on brand promotional activities of double horse(College of co-operation, banking and management, Vellanikkara, 2016) Prabin, M; KAU; Prema, AThesisItem Open Access Study on efficiency of distribution system of double horse products(College of co-operation, banking and management, Vellanikkara, 2016) Sishith, V C; KAU; Prema, AThesisItem Open Access Emotional intelligence among the employees of ESAF microfinance and investment (P) Ltd., Thrissur(College of co-operation, banking and management, Vellanikkara, 2016) Aiswarya, S; KAU; Helen, SThesisItem Open Access Product & service customization model for vegetable marketing in the context of peri-urban agricultural system under Krishi Bhavan, Kazhakuttom, Thiruvananthapuram(College of co-operation, banking and management, Vellanikkara, 2016) Ranjini, Thomas; KAU; Usha, JohnThesisItem Open Access Human resource development climate in Kerala Kerakarshaka Sahakarana Federation Ltd., (KERAFED), Kollam(College of co-operation, banking and management, Vellanikkara, 2016) Kavitha, S; KAU; Arularasan, G SThesisItem Open Access Response behaviour towards branded agro-processed products(Department of Co- operative Management, College of Co- operation, Banking and Management, Vellanikkara, 2006) Prameela, V; KAU; Sakeer Husain, AThe study entitled “Response behaviour towards branded agro-processed products’ was undertaken with the following objectives: 1. To examine the response behaviour towards selected branded agro-processed products (BAPs) 2. To identify the factors influencing purchase decision and consumer choice 3. To compare the response behaviour towards BAPs of co-operative and private sectors The study was conducted in six wards of Kannur Municipality. From each of the selected wards, twenty five household consumers of the five selected BAPs viz., sambar powder, meat masala, rasam powder, pickle and jam were selected. Thus a total of 150 household consumers constituted the sample of the study. The study was based on primary data collected with the help of structured pre-tested interview schedule. Percentage, index, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance and Friedman test were the major statistical tools used for analysis. The study revealed that cent percent of the respondents consumed sambar powder and pickle while majority of them consumed meat masala (96.67%), jam (90.67%) and rasam powder (86.67%). Among the respondents, majority purchased packed branded items. ‘Easy availability’ and ‘convenience’ were the major reasons for the use of the selected BAPs. ‘Dinesh’ was the most known brand among the respondents in the case of all selected BAPs. Advertisement in the electronic media was the major source of awareness about the selected BAPs. ‘Super market’ was preferred by the respondents as the major source of purchase. ‘Dinesh’ was the major brand preferred and used by the respondents in the case of curry powder and pickle, while ‘Happy’ was the most preferred and used brand in the case of jam. ‘Brand loyalty’ was found to be very high among the users of the selected BAPs. ‘Belief in the quality of the products’ supplied by the store was the main reason found for the store loyalty of the consumers. ‘Product features’ and ‘advertisement’ were the important factors that influenced the purchased decision of all the BAPs. ‘Taste’ and ‘freshness’ were the important product features that influenced consumer choice. No significant difference was found between the co-operative and private brands of selected BAPs with regard to factors and product features influencing purchase decision and consumer choice. Any way the consumers were more satisfied with ‘availability’ and ‘quality’ of the products of co-operative and ‘availability’ and ‘taste’ of the products of private organizations. In general consumers were satisfied with the products supplied by both co-operative and private organizations. However, the selected BAPs of co-operative organizations were found to be comparatively better when compared with private products except in the case of jam.ThesisItem Open Access Comparative study of marketing strategies of co-operativfe public and private sector units in handloom industry in Kerala(Department of Rural Marketing Management, College of Co-operation and Banking, Mannuthy, 1989) Xavier, K I; KAU; Rajan Nair, N‘A Comparative Study of Marketing Strategies of co – operative, Public and Private Sector units in Handloom Industry in Kerala’, is aimed at assessing the effectiveness and relative merits and demerits of various marketing strategies followed by Hantex, Hanveev and private sector firms and price spread of selected fabric under different marketing channels. The sampling frame consists of Hantex, Hanveev and our private sector firms each from Trivandrum and cannanore districts. A consumer panel of 75 consumers each was selected from urban and rural areas to study the attitude of consumers on the marketing strategies adopted by the sample units. The attitude was measured using Likert scale. Price spread was analysed by collecting data from ten primary societies, five retail shops, and five hawkers after identifying seven different distribution channels. All the samples were selected randomly. The various marketing strategies, viz., product, price, promotion and distribution were analysed. It was found that majority of the sample units were not in the practice of using these strategies. Even where these strategies were found in vogue, they locked scientific basis as is evident from the conspicous absence of market segmentationThesisItem Open Access Value chain analysis of banana; Nendran variety in Thrissur district(Department of Rural Marketing Management , College of Co-operation , Banking and Management, Vellanikkara, 2019) Haritha Paul; KAU; Vinaikumar, ENendran is one of the most important commercial varieties of banana grown in Kerala. This variety is grown for both fruit and vegetable purposes. The long and thick fruits with good shelf life make nendran widely acceptable among consumers. Nendran varieties like Nedunendran, Chengalikodan, and Zanzibar are the varieties grown as irrigated crops. In south India nendran varieties are grown mostly in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Nedunendran and Chengalikodan varieties are the most popular varieties grown in Kerala. The nendran banana which is originated and cultivated in Chengazhikodu village of Thrissur district in Kerala state of India is known as Chengalikodan nendran and has GI certification since 2015 due to its unique features. It differs from other varieties of nendran as the bunch bear 20 to 25 kg golden yellow coloured fruits if properly taken care of. During the growth stage, traditional farmers cover the banana bunches with old banana leaves so that it can get the colour and special shape. It is also offered as Kaazchakula for lord Guruvayoorappan by the devotees. Even though Kerala has a good potential for banana cultivation, due to careless handling of produce, about 25-40 percent are being wasted, 2-3 percent is processed as value added products, and the remaining being used in the raw form (Report of department of agriculture and co-operation 2017-18). This leads to non-realisation of optimum price and wide price variations, both spatial and temporal, which disheartens farmers. In order to sustain production and growth potential, it is essential to produce value added products from banana, so that farmers can get an assured price for their produce throughout the year. Due to inefficiencies at various points in the value chain, the producer gets less than optimal and the consumer pays more than optimal price. The present study entitled ―Value chain analysis of banana; Nendran variety in Thrissur district‖ was undertaken with the objectives viz., to map the value chain of Nendran variety of banana, to identify and analyse the various chains and actors involved in the value chain, to analyse the costs and margin involved in the value chain and to identify the constraints and possible solutions at different levels in the value chain to enhance the efficiency. Two varieties of nendran namely nedunendran and Chengalikodan were taken for the study. For the purpose of collection of primary data a sample of 60 farmers (who cultivated at least 200 suckers of Chengalikodan or nedunendran banana) were selected from four blocks of Thrissur district (15 farmers each). From the other actors in the value chain, two SKS of VFPCK, seven wholesalers, 16 retailers and 80 consumers were selected based on the information received from farmers. Primary survey was conducted using a pre- tested structured interview schedule. The collected data were analysed by using percentage analysis, indices, rank order scale, Kruskal Walli test, ANOVA, price spread, marketing cost, marketing efficiency, and marketing margin. Mapping the value chain of Nendran variety of banana revealed that the core processes include input supply, production, procurement, marketing and consumption. Farmers, wholesalers, retailers, consumers, Krishibhavan, local traders, and SBI were the major actors involved in the value chain of Chengalikodan, whereas farmers, SKS, retailers, consumers, local traders, and SBI were the major actors involved in nedunenthran. It was observed that almost the entire produce of Chengalikodan and nedunendran flowed in the form of raw banana among the actors. The main source of information was Krishibhavan for Chengalikodan farmers and SKS for nedunendran farmers. The rest of actors in the Chengalikodan and nedunendran depended on Shakthan Thampuran Fruits and Vegetables market (Thrissur) for collection of business related information about the product and price. These varieties were sold within the various places of Thrissur district, and there was no export activity undertaken by the value chain actors. It was found that Chengalikodan farmers were earning a high margin of 56.6/kg compared to a margin of 37.3/kg for nedunendran. The study also identified major constraints faced by the actors in the value chain. The analysis of various chains and actors involved in the value chain highlighted that there was only one marketing channel for Chengalikodan and one for nedunendran in the study area. Farmers, wholesalers, retailers and consumers were the actors involved in the value chain of Chengalikodan whereas farmers, SKS, retailers and consumers for nedunendran. No one took advance amount in sales contract in any manner. The actors other than retailers and consumers had to wait one to two weeks for realisation of price. Consumers of both Chengalikodan and nedunendran expressed moderately favourable attitude towards taste of banana. ANOVA results showed that there was no difference in the attitude of consumers towards Chengalikodan and nedunenthran. Chengalikodan and nedunendran consumers had a resigned stage in respect to price, taste, nutrient value, freshness, hygiene, availability and shelf life of the nendran banana. Analysis of variance result indicated that the satisfaction level of consumers was similar for both Chengalikodan and nedunendran. The cost and margins involved in the value chain showed that there was a considerable difference in margin received by Chengalikodan farmers ( 56.6/kg) and nedunendran farmers ( 37.3/kg). Comparing the channel of Chengalikodan and nedunenthran, Chengalikodan farmers were receiving more margins from sales. The wholesalers received a margin of 10.1/kg and SKS 15.1/kg whereas retailers earned a margin of 8.9/kilogram and of 2.1/kilogram for Chengalikodan and nedunendran respectively. In short it was clear that Chengalikodan was more profitable than nedunendran cultivation. Marketing efficiency was higher in Chengalikodan than nedunendran. It might be due to the fact that Chengalikodan was a popular GI product in Kerala and the taste, quality and appearance helped the product to get premium price. The identified constraints faced by the farmers were the lack of availability of labour, lack of irrigation facilities, effect of climate change, natural calamities, high transportation cost, attack of pest and diseases, delay in cash realisation and attack of animals. Lack of fair price, price fluctuations and lack of knowledge about financial support system were the main constraints cited by the SKS. For wholesalers and retailers, price fluctuations in the market were the major constraint. The other constraints are inadequate storage facility, quality of the product, less shelf life, attack of rats, insects etc, inadequate demand and proper market information. Non availability of required quantity of product throughout the year was pointed out as the major problem faced by consumers. To conclude, the present study mapped the value chain of nendran variety of banana and analysed the various actors involved in the value chain. The study also examined the cost and margin for each value chain actors and identified the constraints faced by them at different levels. The study found out one marketing channel each for Chengalikodan and nedunendran in the studied area. Among these marketing channels in the value chain, channel for Chengalikodan provided a good profit margin to all actors. The involvements of intermediaries still exist in the value chain of nendran varieties. It reduced the marketing efficiency of nendran value chain due to the increased cost and shared margin among the intermediaries. The farmers faced the problems such as lack of irrigation facility, lack of quality suckers, lack of quality pesticides, natural calamities, lack of training on new production technology, post harvest technology, and high transportation cost. The important suggestions of the study are to provide quality pesticides and quality suckers to farmers through Krishibhavan and SKS, intervention of Kerala Agricultural University in providing appropriate technical guidance and KVK may conduct trails/ demonstrations on the technical constraints faced by banana growers, and to provide irrigation facility by releasing water through canals for farmers as and when it is needed.
