Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

20181
Reset filters
Subject: Agricultural Extension × Author: Modem Ravikishore × End date: 2020 × Start date: 2016 × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Performance effectiveness of technology dissemination system of state department of agriculture in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh: a comparative analysis
    (Department of Agricultural Extension College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 2018) Modem Ravikishore; Seema B
    The present study entitled ‘Performance effectiveness of technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh: A comparative analysis’ was conducted in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh states during 2014-2017 covering 200 extension professionals and 100 farmers form both the states with equal proportions. Agricultural extension workers of State Department of Agriculture are personnel who are responsible for meeting the goals of extension system. Evaluation of the success of extension delivery programmes, in most cases, has focused on performance effectiveness of extension personnel of State Department of Agriculture. However, the effectiveness and efficiency with which extension personnel deliver extension services cannot be over looked as this may in fact be a greater reason for success or failure of extension programmes. This necessitates the present study with the objective of assessing and comparing performance effectiveness of State Department of Agriculture in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh vis-a-vis technology dissemination system. Comparative analysis of technology dissemination systems of Kerala and Andhra Pradesh would allow inter-scalability of technologies. The findings demonstrated that most of the extension professionals with respect to Kerala as well as Andhra Pradesh states have moderately favorable attitudes towards technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture (SDA). Comparative analysis of attitude among Kerala and Andhra Pradesh extension personnel have shown that there was significant difference towards State Department of Agriculture. Attitude of Kerala extension professionals was influenced by the factors age, experience, training and organizational commitment. Attitude of Andhra Pradesh extension personnel was influenced by the factors training, organizational commitment, perceived workload, job satisfaction and achievement motivation. Performance effectiveness index of technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture (SDA) was devised and measured in three components namely: Human effectiveness component, Dissemination system component and Organisational effectiveness component and the results revealed that majority of the extension personnel with respect to Kerala as well as Andhra Pradesh, performance effectiveness index was medium. Comparative analysis of Performance effectiveness index of technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture (SDA) among Kerala and Andhra Pradesh extension personnel have shown that there was significant difference. Performance effectiveness index of Kerala extension professionals was influenced by the factors like experience, training, job satisfaction, participation efficiency and achievement motivation. Performance effectiveness index of Andhra Pradesh extension professionals was influenced by the factors like experience, training, organizational commitment, innovation proneness and participation efficiency. The study also revealed that most of the farmers with respect to Kerala as well as Andhra Pradesh states, perceived that technology dissemination system of State Departments of Agriculture (SDA) was moderately favourable. Comparative analysis of farmers’ perception towards technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture (SDA) among Kerala and Andhra Pradesh states have shown that there was significant difference. The findings also demonstrated that most of the respondents with respect to Kerala as well as Andhra Pradesh states, belonged to middle age category, comprising medium experience; attended very high number of trainings. It was also found that most of the respondents from both states having normative commitment with no significant difference. Perceived workload, job satisfaction and decision making ability of the respondents from both states was medium with significant difference. Achievement motivation and innovation proneness of the respondents from both states was medium with no significant difference. Hence, the study assessed and compared the performance effectiveness of technology dissemination system of State Department of Agriculture (SDA) in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh by developing performance effectiveness index which also revealed that there was significant difference in their performance with clearly depicted constraints and suggestions from both the states.