Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Eco - Friendly management strategies against pod borer complex of Cowpea vigna unguiculata var.sesquiedalis (L) Verdcourt
    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2013) Subhasree, S; KAU; Maicykutty Mathew, P
    The investigations on “Eco-friendly management strategies against pod borer complex of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt” was taken up at Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara during October 2012 to January 2013. The short duration bushy variety of cowpea, Bhagyalakshmi susceptible to pod borers was used for the study. The experiment aimed at, evaluating the efficacy of a botanical viz., azadirachtin (0.005%), bioagents viz., Beauveria bassiana (1%), Metarhizium anisopliae (1%), Bacillus thuringiensis (0.2%) along with their sequential application (azadirachtin followed by B. bassiana, azadirachtin followed by M. anisopliae, azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis), a safer chemical viz., flubendiamide 480SC (0.008%) and a standard check (quinalphos 0.05%) against pod borer complex of cowpea under field conditions, studying the species composition of pod borer complex of cowpea and the natural enemies associated with them. Considering the three consecutive sprays at fortnightly intervals starting from flowering, flubendiamide was found to be highly effective in managing the larval population of pod borers compared to azadirachtin and bioagents. A single application of the same reduced the population of pod borers significantly. In the case of quinalphos the population of pod borers showed a decreasing trend up to seven days after each spraying and increased thereafter. Azadirachtin, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis recorded larval population below economic threshold level starting from 14th day after first spraying till the end of cropping period. With respect to per cent pod damage (in terms of number and weight) flubendiamide was found to be significantly superior over control and all other treatments were on par. Though quinalphos recorded the highest total yield both in terms of weight and number, application of flubendiamide resulted in the highest number of marketable pods. The total yield recorded in terms of weight was higher in B. thuringiensis than other bioagents. Azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis application resulted in high marketable yield among bioagents and botanical, followed by B. bassiana and were on par with the two chemical insecticides. Flubendiamide recorded the highest B: C ratio followed by quinalphos. Among the bioagents B. bassiana recorded a B: C ratio next to quinalphos and was followed by B. thuringiensis, azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis and M. anisopliae. Two species of pod borers were recorded on cowpea viz., spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) and pea blue butterfly (Lampides boeticus). M. vitrata was the major species of pod borer under Vellanikkara conditions compared to L. boeticus. The population of L. boeticus increased when there were more pods in the field compared to flowers. Two species of hymenopteran larval parasitoids belonging to the family Braconidae observed on M. vitrata were Apanteles sp. and Phanerotoma sp.
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Eco-friendly management strategies against pod borer complex of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt
    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, College Of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, 2013) Subhasree, S; KAU; Maicykutty P, Mathew
    The investigations on “Eco-friendly management strategies against pod borer complex of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt” was taken up at Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara during October 2012 to January 2013. The short duration bushy variety of cowpea, Bhagyalakshmi susceptible to pod borers was used for the study. The experiment aimed at, evaluating the efficacy of a botanical viz., azadirachtin (0.005%), bioagents viz., Beauveria bassiana (1%), Metarhizium anisopliae (1%), Bacillus thuringiensis (0.2%) along with their sequential application (azadirachtin followed by B. bassiana, azadirachtin followed by M. anisopliae, azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis), a safer chemical viz., flubendiamide 480SC (0.008%) and a standard check (quinalphos 0.05%) against pod borer complex of cowpea under field conditions, studying the species composition of pod borer complex of cowpea and the natural enemies associated with them. Considering the three consecutive sprays at fortnightly intervals starting from flowering, flubendiamide was found to be highly effective in managing the larval population of pod borers compared to azadirachtin and bioagents. A single application of the same reduced the population of pod borers significantly. In the case of quinalphos the population of pod borers showed a decreasing trend up to seven days after each spraying and increased thereafter. Azadirachtin, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis recorded larval population below economic threshold level starting from 14th day after first spraying till the end of cropping period. With respect to per cent pod damage (in terms of number and weight) flubendiamide was found to be significantly superior over control and all other treatments were on par. Though quinalphos recorded the highest total yield both in terms of weight and number, application of flubendiamide resulted in the highest number of marketable pods. The total yield recorded in terms of weight was higher in B. thuringiensis than other bioagents. Azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis application resulted in high marketable yield among bioagents and botanical, followed by B. bassiana and were on par with the two chemical insecticides. Flubendiamide recorded the highest B: C ratio followed by quinalphos. Among the bioagents B. bassiana recorded a B: C ratio next to quinalphos and was followed by B. thuringiensis, azadirachtin followed by B. thuringiensis and M. anisopliae. Two species of pod borers were recorded on cowpea viz., spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) and pea blue butterfly (Lampides boeticus). M. vitrata was the major species of pod borer under Vellanikkara conditions compared to L. boeticus. The population of L. boeticus increased when there were more pods in the field compared to flowers. Two species of hymenopteran larval parasitoids belonging to the family Braconidae observed on M. vitrata were Apanteles sp. and Phanerotoma sp.