Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    In vitro morphological and molecular evaluation of rice genotypes and validation of markers for salinity tolerance
    (DRPCAU, Pusa, Samastipur, 2018) Kumari, Rima; Kumar, Harsh
    A set of thirty rice varieties including two tolerant (Pokkali and CSR-36) and two susceptible (IR-29 and IR-64) checks were screened for assessment of their salt tolerance at early seedling stage on the basis of in vitro seed germination and seedling growth at different salinity levels (0, 4, 8 and 16 dS m-1) created by application of salt mixture consisting of NaCl, CaCl2, Na2SO4 in 7:2:1 ratio. Seed germination and seedling growth were adversely affected with the increase of salt concentrations. The salt tolerance index (STI) of the rice varieties was calculated on the basis of seed germination, seedling shoot and root dry weights at different levels of salt stresses. Phenotypic grouping of the thirty rice varieties for their salt tolerance level on the basis of overall salinity tolerance indices across in vitro seed germination and seedling growth (shoot and root dry weight) under salt stress clearly reflected that seventeen varieties, namely, Pokkali, CSR-36, Mandakini, Kranthi, Jyothi, Bardhan, Pusa Sugandh-2, Duna Sankhi, Sanwal Basmati, Ratnagiri-4, Shanthi, Rajendra Dhan-102, Sahbhagi Dhan, Vaisak, Annada, Badami and Jyotrirmayee were highly tolerant to salt stress. Among the remaining entries, Pusa-834, Sarsa, Govind, Khira, Pusa Sugandh-5, MTU-7029 and Saraswathi were found to be moderately salt tolerant, whereas varieties IR-29, IR-64, Daya, Kalinga-3, Golaka and Shatabdi were highly susceptible to salt stress. Out of thirty rice varieties, eighteen rice varieties, namely, Pokkali, CSR-36, IR-29, IR-64, Mandakini, Pusa Sugandh-2, Saraswathi, Ratnagiri-4, Rajendra Dhan-102, Sahbhagi Dhan, Badami, Sarsa, Jyotrirmayee, MTU-7029, Golaka, Daya, Vaisak, and Shatabdi were further screened with the help of ISSR, SSR, salt stress responsive candidate genes and EST primer pairs for the purpose of their molecular profiling in relation to their salinity tolerance. Genetic profiling of entries with a panel of 14 ISSR markers generated altogether 483 allelic variants including 236 shared and 247 unique alleles with an average of 34.50 alleles per primer, revealing ample extent of genetic differentiation and divergence amongst the entries. Among these markers, 811, 814, 815, 823, 834, 836, 840, 841, 842, 872 were found to be highly polymorphic and informative on the basis of their PIC and PP values. However, using a panel of salt stress response related 24 SSR primer pairs, altogether 205 allelic variants including 114 shared and 91 unique alleles were detected with an average of 8.54 alleles per primer due to length variation of simple sequence repeats. Simple sequence repeat loci with di-nucleotide and tri-nucleotide repeat motifs detected greater number of alleles than the repeat loci with tetra-nucleotide and complex repeat motifs. Additionally, the simple sequence repeat loci with CT, GT, AT, AG and AC di-nucleotide repeat motifs detected greater number of alleles. Contrarily, the loci with GA and CA di-nucleotide repeat motifs appeared to detect relatively lesser number of alleles. Considering the number of alleles generated in conjunction with the level of polymorphism detected in the present study, the primers RM 302, RM 8094, RM 10665, RM 10694, RM 10748 and RM 10825 appeared to be highly polymorphic and comparatively more informative primers. Six SSR primer pairs, namely, RM 140, RM 1287, RM 3412, RM 10745, RM 10764 and RM 10772 were validated on the basis of their efficiency to distinguish salt tolerant varieties from susceptible varieties. These six primers can be utilized for the purpose of genetic differentiation and discrimination in relation to salt stress responsiveness of the rice genotypes. Similarly, microsatellite containing salt stress responsive candidate gene (OsHKT1;5, SNAC1, CDMK, CCC, SHMT1 and SHMT2) and microsatellite lacking salt stress responsive candidate gene (OsHKT1;1, OsHKT1;3, OsHKT2;3 and OsHKT2;4) specific markers based genetic profiling allowed unambiguous discrimination of salt stress responsive and tolerant entries, validating their utility for the purpose of differentiation and discrimination of salt stress sensitive and tolerant varieties. Principal coordinate analysis completely supported the results obtained from hierarchical classification of the varieties. Using a panel of eight salt stress responsive EST-contigs based markers, monomorphic bands amongst all the 18 varieties were recorded for six markers, namely, Contig2 (Ferritin superfamily), Contig54 (Plant peroxidase superfamily), Contig138 (ATPase expression protein), Contig314 (Exonuclease), Contig545 (Major latex protein) and Contig633 (Protein kinase), revealing genetic similarity with respect to primer binding sites and molecular size of targeted genomic regions. Remaining two markers specific to Ferritin superfamily (Contig43) and Microtubule associated protein (Contig215) genes revealed genetic polymorphism in the form of presence or absence of bands. Thus, combining in vitro morphological and molecular assessment, seventeen varieties were considered as salt tolerant varieties which can be used as parental donor in rice breeding programme to develop salt tolerant rice varieties.
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    In vitro Screening and Induction of Salt Tolerance in Rice
    (Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), 2014) Kumari, Rima; Kumar, Harsh
    Six selected cultivars of rice namely BPT-5204, MTU-7029, Narendra Usar Dhan-3, Rajendra Bhagwati, CSR-30 and Pusa Basmati-1 were screened for salinity tolerance on the basis of seed germination in vivo and in vitro, seedling growth and callus growth under different salt stress (0-2.5%) created by a salt mixture of NaCl, CaCl2, Na2SO4 in 7:2:1 ratio. Cultivars CSR-30 and Narendra Usar Dhan-3 were found to be the most salt tolerant, cvs. MTU-7029 and BPT-5204 to be moderately tolerant and cvs. Rajendra Bhagwati and Pusa Basmati-1 were found to be salt sensitive respectively. The formation of callus and their continued growth at higher levels of salt stress indicated the induction and formation of salt tolerant cells and calluses. The cultivars of rice, their normal calluses and salt tolerant calluses were further screened by 14 salt tolerance linked SSR primer pairs for evaluation of their salt tolerance and for detection of induced salt tolerant callus. On the basis of SSR marker, cultivars CSR-30 and Narendra Usar Dhan-3 can be considered as salt tolerant while cv. Pusa Basmati-1 can be considered as salt sensitive. The other three cvs. MTU-7029, BPT-5204 and Rajendra Bhagwati can be considered as moderately salt tolerant. Molecular marker studies also confirmed induction of salt tolerant calluses in cvs. MTU-7029, Rajendra Bhagwati and BPT-5204.