Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Effect of nutrient management in maize under different tillage practices
    (Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), 2018) Kumar, Prabhat; Kumar, M.
    An experiment on “Effect of nutrient management in maize under different tillage practices” was conducted at TCA, Dholi, Farm, Muzaffarpur during Kharif 2016-17 with maize variety (Shaktiman-5) in a Split Plot Design. Main plot consist of three different tillage practices viz., a) Zero tillage (ZT), b) Conventional tillage (CT) and c) Bed planting (BP) and sub plot comprised three different level of nutrient management viz., a) Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) (120, 60 and 50 kg/ha N, P2O5 and K2O), b) Site Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM) based on nutrient expert and c) Farmers practice (FP) (150% of RDF + 10 ton FYM). The treatments were replicated thrice in split plot design. Observation on various growth parameter, yield attributes and yield of maize. Growth attributes i.e., plant height, leaf area, days to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking, plant population at maturity and dry matter accumulation were significantly higher under bed planting tillage practices over zero tillage and conventional tillage practices. Among the different nutrient management practices, farmer practices was reported significantly higher growth attributes than recommended dose of fertilizer but statistically at par with site specific nutrient management practices. Highest yield attributes and yield viz., cobs/plant, length of cobs, grains/cob, girth of cobs, test weight and grain yield were observed under bed planting tillage practices which was significantly superior over remaining tillage practices while highest yield attributes and yield were obtained under farmer practices which was significantly superior over recommended dose of fertilizer but statistically at par with site specific nutrient management practices. Among the different tillage practice and nutrient management practices, maximum gross return (106396 `/ha) and net return (64111 `/ha) were obtained under the bed planting which was significantly higher than rest of tillage practices whereas maximum net returns (63523 `/ha) and B:C ratio (1.89) were observed under SSNM which was significantly superior over other nutrient management practices.