Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Population Dynamics of Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and its Management on Tomato
    (Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), 2017) Jha, Sudeepa Kumari; Kumar, Manoj
    Population dynamics of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci and its management through use of insecticides - profenophos @ 500 g a.i. ha-1, imidacloprid @ 20 g a.i. ha-1, cypermethrin @ 25 g a.i. ha-1, indoxacarb @ 50 g a.i. ha-1, profenophos (40 %) + cypermethrin (4%) @ 440 g a.i. ha-1, neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) 5 %, neem oil 2 %, tobacco decoction 5 % and yam bean seed extract (YBSE) 5 % in tomato variety ‘Avinash – 2’ was studied at Vegetable Research Farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa during Rabi 2016-17. Peak population (42.4 per three leaves) of whitefly was observed on 70th day after transplanting. Temperature (max. and min.) and sunshine (hrs) had a negative significant correlation, while morning and evening relative humidity had a positive significant correlation but wind speed had non- significant positive correlation. The correlation coefficient (r) was computed for max. Temperature (-0.481), min. temperature (-0.483), morning relative humidity (0.514), evening relative humidity (0.483), wind speed (0.007) and sunshine hrs (-0.641), respectively. The weather parameters were found to contribute around 55.70 per cent impact on population of Bemisia tabaci when acted together (R2 = 0.5570). The mean per cent reduction in whitefly population over control after first, fifth and seventh day of 1st, 2nd and 3rd spray of insecticides was maximum in imidacloprid @ 20 g a.i. ha-1 (47.41 %, 81.03 % and 88.14 %, respectively) followed by profenophos 40 % + cypermethrin 4% @ 440 g a.i. ha-1 (42.20, 77.38 and 85.93 %, respectively). All the insecticidal treatments proved profitable over control and increase in yield varied from the maximum of 90 q ha-1 in imidacloprid (20 g a.i. ha-1) to the minimum of 48 q ha-1 in tobacco decoction 5 %. The benefit cost ratio was highest in imidacloprid @ 20 g a.i. ha-1 (22.69: 1) followed by cypermethrin @ 25 g a.i. ha-1 (17.21:1) and lowest in YBSE 5% (1.53: 1).