Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    S election of native Trichoderma strain with Biocontrol potential from sugarcane rhizosystem
    (Dr.RPCAU, Pusa, 2021) Rajput, Virendra Singh; Dwivedi, Meenakshi
    In the currently studies, Trichoderma samples were isolated from rhizosystem of sugarcane crop. The isolates were vigorously tested for their Biocontrol potential. On the basis of their antagonistic potential against C. falcatum pathotypes Cf 07 and Cf 08, the promising isolates were selected. A total of 27 isolates each were obtained from samples from SRI, Pusa and Harpur Jhilli, Pusa. Based on visual cultural differences, 19 isolates were screened from SRI sample and 16 isolates were from Harpur Jhilli sample. Out of the isolates, T SR 11, T HJ 7, T HJ 14 and T. asperellum stronglyinhibited the growth of the pathogen in vitro. The isolates were then dual cultured with the pathotypes in the presence of fungicides (carbendazim 50 WP and azoxystrobin 23 SC), in order to create a micro-environment so that all the three components can interact with each other at the same time. It was found that carbendazim completely inhibited Trichoderma isolates at all the doses (RD, ½ RD, ¼ RD). Hence it cannot be used with Trichoderma under IDM programme. Whereas, azoxystrobin 23 SC was found to be compatible with Trichoderma isolates. Moreover, it was found to aggravate the growth of Trichoderma isolates and suppress the growth of the pathogen. Inhibition of pathogen by ½ RD and ¼ RD in integrated approach was comparable with inhibition at RD of the fungicide. Hence, it was concluded that azoxystrobin 23 SC could be used in reduced doses (1/2 RD and ¼ RD) with BiocontrolTrichoderma isolates and still would be able to manage the pathogen effectively. Hence, it gives a hope that effective IDM strategy against rd rot could be chalked out including azoxystrobin and compatible BiocontrolTrichoderma isolates.