Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Studies on bunch covering in Banana cv. Grand Naine
    (DRPCAU, Pusa, 2020) Chougala, Ajay; Kanth, Neeharika
    The aim was to assess the effect of bunch cover for quality production in banana cv. Grand Naine over control of plants having un-covered bunches. The field experiment was carried at AICRP for fruit crops, RPCAU Pusa, Samastipur, during the year 2018-2019. The treatment consisted of different bunch covering materials viz., Blue non-woven polypropylene, Black fabric, Transparent polythene bag, Paper bag, Jute/gunny bag, Jute bag+ transparent polythene bag, Dry banana leaves and were compared with control (without bunch covering). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with eight treatments. which were replicated thrice. Results of present study showed that bunch covering with blue non-woven polypropylene recorded significantly higher mean finger length (18.76 cm), mean finger weight (122.07 g), bunch length (68.13 cm), bunch girth (38.06 cm), bunch weight (24 kg), weight of second hand (1.43 kg), fruit yield (74.04 tons/ ha), gross returns (7,40,400.00), net income ( Rs 5,28,327.00). Whereas treatment with transparent polythene bag recorded maximum pulp weight (89.66 g), pulp: peel ratio (2.96), least off-grade fingers (3.33) and higher B: C ratio (2.53). These two treatments are at par with each other in almost all parameters which were studied. The treatment control (no bunch cover) recorded higher scarring beetle infestation (26%), Off-grade fingers (17%), TSS (21.9° Brix), titratable acidity (0.35%) and total sugars (16.03 %). It can be concluded that bunch covering showed significant effect on physio-morphological traits and quality of banana thus, covered bunch banana fruits are more attractive to the consumers, and result in higher market price as well as significantly higher net profit over control.