Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    SCREENING OF PAPAYA GENOTYPES UNDER WATERLOGGING CONDITION AND ITS MANAGEMENT
    (DRPCAU, PUSA, 2022) K.M, RENUKA SWAMY; Kanth, Neeharika
    The present investigation entitled “Screening of papaya genotypes under waterlogging condition and its management” was carried out during 2021-2022 in HI-tech horticulture unit, Department of Horticulture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur (Bihar). The research work was carried out with two experiments, first experiment was laid out in Two-factorial Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 9 different types of treatment viz., Control( without waterlogging) + Red lady, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Red Lady, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Red Lady, Control( without waterlogging) + Pusa Delicious, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Pusa Delicious, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Pusa Delicious, Control( without waterlogging) + Local Collection 1, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Local Collection 1, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Local Collection 1 which were replicated three times. The results of the investigation revealed that, among the different genotypes used Pusa Delicious gave better performance in different levels of waterlogged condition on growth and physiological parameters. With reference to different genotypes, Pusa Delicious recorded maximum plant height (78.23cm), relative growth rate (0.04), shoot length (64.62cm), chlorophyll index (44.57), relative water content (89.31%), fresh weight of shoot (187.57g), fresh weight of root (43.40g), dry weight of shoot (22.53g), dry weight of root (8.31g), number of leaves (8.11), leaf area (2.07m2), root length (23.63 cm), root to shoot ratio (0.31), survival (66.66%), flood tolerance potential (1) and lowest leaf senescence (13.63 %). Second was laid out in Three-factors Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 12 different types of treatment viz., Submergence 10 cm above soil surface +Red Lady + 5 MgO₂, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Red Lady +10g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Red Lady + 5g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Red Lady +10g MgO₂, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface+ Pusa Delicious + 5g MgO₂, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Pusa Delicious + 10g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Pusa Delicious + 5g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface +, Pusa Delicious + 10g MgO₂, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Local Collection 1 + 5g MgO₂, Submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Local Collection 1+10g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface + Local Collection 1 + 5g MgO₂, Submergence 15 cm above soil surface+ Local Collection 1+ 10g MgO₂. The results of the investigation showed that, among the different concentration of chemicals ( 5g and 10 g MgO₂), 10 g gave better performance under waterlogged condition on growth and physiological parameters of three genotypes. With refers to different treatment, submergence 10 cm above soil surface + Pusa Delicious + 10g MgO₂ recorded the maximum plant height (85.25cm), relative growth rate (0.06), shoot length (70.24 cm), chlorophyll index (49.70), relative water content (93.40%), fresh weight of shoot (198.74g), fresh weight of root (50.49 g), dry weight of shoot (26.42 g), dry weight of root (11.50 g), number of leaves (10.32), leaf area (2.41m2), root length (32.19cm), root to shoot ratio(0.41), survival percentage (66.66%), flood tolerance potential (1) and lowest leaf senescence (-3.38 %)