Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Integrated nutrient management under Potato + Maize intercropping system in north Bihar condition
    (Dr.RPCAU, Pusa, 2022) SINGH, MAYANGLAMBAM BISHONATH; DWIVEDI, D.K.
    A field experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons of 20l9-20 and 2020-21 on potato + maize intercropping system to assess the impact of different integrated nutrient management at Research Farm of Tirhut college of Agriculture, Dholi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. The treatment combination were- T1 (RDF for sole potato), T2 (RDF for sole maize), T3 (control potato + maize, no fertilizer and FYM), T4 (RDF for potato + RDF for maize), T5 (RDF for potato + 50% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1), T6 (RDF for potato + 50% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1), T7 (RDF for potato + 75% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1), T8 (RDF for potato + 75% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1), T9 (RDF for potato + 100% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1), T10 (RDF for potato + 100% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1), T11 (RDF for potato + 125% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1), T12 (RDF for potato + 125% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1), T13 (125% RDF for potato +125% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1) and T14 (125% RDF for potato +125% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1). The varieties used for the experiment are Kufri Ashoka (potato) and Shaktiman-5 (maize). The RDF of potato and maize were 150:90:100 and 150:75:50 kg ha-1 (NPK) kg per ha. The spacing was maintained at 60 cm x 20 cm for both the crops. Maize was sown on the side of the ridges 7 days after planting of potato. The population of both the crops was maintained at 100 %. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) replicated thrice. The experimental site was sandy loam in texture, low in organic carbon (0.36 %), slightly alkaline with pH-8.21, low in available nitrogen (226.78 kg ha-1) and available phosphorus (21.25 kg ha-1), while medium in available potassium (142.42 kg ha-1). The growth attributes including height of plant, shoots per plant, number of leaves per plant, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation, yield attributes such as number of tubers per plant, weight of tubers per plant, length of cob, number of grain per cobs, etc. and yield of both crops (potato and maize) were significantly impacted by the different levels of INM. For potato, during 2019-20 and 2020-21, the treatment T14 - 125% RDF of potato + 125% RDF of maize + 20 t FYM ha-1 gave maximum plant height (44.31 and 43.09 cm), shoots per plant (6.07 and 6.00), leaves per plant (41.47 and 42.13), LAI (3.85 and 3.44), dry matter accumulation (69.60 and 72.88 g plant-1), bulking rate of tubers (8.72 and 8.65 g plant-1 day-1), tuber yield (266.23 and 263.98 q ha-1), total uptake of N (97.02 and 97.33 kg ha-1), P (39.62 and 40.77 kg ha-1) and K (132.57 and 132.56 kg ha-1). It was at par with T10 (RDF for potato + 100% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1), T12 (RDF for potato + 125% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1) and T13 (125% RDF for potato +125% RDF for maize + 10 t FYM ha-1). Same pattern was observed in case of maize where T14 gave significantly maximum plant height (245.20 and 240.49 cm), leaves per plant (11.27 and 11.13), LAI (4.36 and 4.58), dry matter accumulation (214.04 and 212.75 g plant-1), length of cob (20.67and 20.33 cm), girth of cob (15.33 and 15.18 cm), number of grains cob-1 (386.23 and 371.93), weight of grains cob-1(99.48 and 95.84 g cob-1), grain yield (92.33and 90.41 q ha-1), total uptake of N (174.74 and 172.44 kg ha-1), P (51.70 and 53.88 kg ha-1) and K (113.47 and 114.13 kg ha-1). Under intercropping system, T14 (125% RDF for potato +125% RDF for maize + 20 t FYM ha-1) significantly higher potato equivalent yield (381.64 and 377.00 q ha-1), gross return (4,29,905 and 4,20,884 ₹ ha-1), net return (2,81,204 and 2,43,333 ₹ ha-1) but higher B:C was achieved from T2: RDF for sole maize (3.29) during 2019-20, while in 2020-21, same was observed from T1: RDF for sole potato (2.70). T14 also recorded significantly higher residual available nitrogen (287.06 and 278.97 kg per ha), phosphorus (41.25 and 46.87 kg per ha) and potassium (173.21 and 175.44 kg per ha) in soil after harvesting of the crops. The land equivalent ratio was also higher under T14 during both the years (2.19 and 2.21), while being at par with T10, T12 and T13. These four treatments (T10, T12, T13 and T14) while being at par with each other, were significantly superior over other treatments in all respect.