Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Optimizing tillage and nutrient management practices for maize-pigeon pea intercropping systems
    (DRPCAU, Pusa, 2020) Kumar, Pradeep; Kumar, Mritunjay
    Conservation agriculture is the effective way of utilization of natural resources and sustainable crop production. In CA practices we led this experiment maize+pigeon pea intercropping system for increases the crop intensification that lead to increase crop production. This experiment on “Optimizing tillage and nutrient management practices for maize+pigeon pea intercropping systems” was conducted during 2019-2020 at TCA research farm, Dholi (Dr. RPCAU, Pusa). The experiment was laid out in split plot design with 4 main plot treatment viz., T1: Permanent bed (PB), T2: Zero tillage (ZT), T3: Fresh bed (FB) and T4: Conventional tillage and 3 sub-plot treatment viz., N1: 100% Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), N2: 120% Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and N3: 80% Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) witch were replicated thrice. The result indicated that the parameters of growth, yield attributes and yield of both crops were affected by tillage and nutrient management. The plant height of maize and pigeon pea, LAI of maize and primary and secondary branches of pigeon pea were significant influenced by tillage and nutrient management and it were higher in PB and it at par with ZT compared to FB and CT, similarly, nutrient management also significantly affected these parameters and 120% RDF application showed at par with 100% RDF application compared to 80% RDF application. The higher growth under these treatments were also associated with yield attributing character of maize viz., length of cob, number of rows per cob, number of grains per row, test weight and of pigeon pea viz., number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and test weight. Maize grown under PB tillage recorded (58.9 q/ha) of grain yield being at par with grown under ZT (56.4 q/ha) compared to CT (49.0 q/ha). However, pigeon pea also recorded higher grain yield with PB (21.8 q/ha) remained superior to its yields under ZT (19.5 q/ha) FB (18.2 q/ha) and CT (18.0 q/ha) practices while, under the nutrient management practices recorded highest yield with 120% RDF application in maize (58.1 q/ha) and in pigeon pea (21.1 q/ha) which was over the 100% RDF application in both crop. Harvest index of both crops were higher in PB and 120% RDF applications which was closely followed by ZT and 100% RDF application. Considering the overall impact of conservation agriculture practices, growing maize+pigeon pea intercropping under PB, crop recorded higher maize equivalent yield (130.7 q/ha) at par with ZT (120.7 q/ha) over the FB (112.1 q/ha) and CT (108.4 q/ha) while, 120% RDF application recorded (127.7 q/ha) over the 100% RDF (117.7 q/ha) and 80% RDF (108.6 q/ha) application under nutrient management. The gross return, net return and B:C ratio from maize+pigeon pea intercropping obtained significantly higher under PB (244839, 189239 and 3.4) compared to FB (210514, 153665 and 2.7) and CT (203320, 147070 and 2.6) while under nutrient management, the gross return, net return and B:C ratio recorded higher with 120% RDF application (239028, 181223 and 3.1) compared to 80% RDF (204076, 150031 and 2.8). the soil physico-chemical properties viz., bulk density, pH, EC, organic carbon, available N, P and K were also favourably influenced by PB and ZT practices but it’s were not significantly affected by nutrient management practices.