Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa

In the imperial Gazetteer of India 1878, Pusa was recorded as a government estate of about 1350 acres in Darbhanba. It was acquired by East India Company for running a stud farm to supply better breed of horses mainly for the army. Frequent incidence of glanders disease (swelling of glands), mostly affecting the valuable imported bloodstock made the civil veterinary department to shift the entire stock out of Pusa. A British tobacco concern Beg Sutherland & co. got the estate on lease but it also left in 1897 abandoning the government estate of Pusa. Lord Mayo, The Viceroy and Governor General, had been repeatedly trying to get through his proposal for setting up a directorate general of Agriculture that would take care of the soil and its productivity, formulate newer techniques of cultivation, improve the quality of seeds and livestock and also arrange for imparting agricultural education. The government of India had invited a British expert. Dr. J. A. Voelcker who had submitted as report on the development of Indian agriculture. As a follow-up action, three experts in different fields were appointed for the first time during 1885 to 1895 namely, agricultural chemist (Dr. J. W. Leafer), cryptogamic botanist (Dr. R. A. Butler) and entomologist (Dr. H. Maxwell Lefroy) with headquarters at Dehradun (U.P.) in the forest Research Institute complex. Surprisingly, until now Pusa, which was destined to become the centre of agricultural revolution in the country, was lying as before an abandoned government estate. In 1898. Lord Curzon took over as the viceroy. A widely traveled person and an administrator, he salvaged out the earlier proposal and got London’s approval for the appointment of the inspector General of Agriculture to which the first incumbent Mr. J. Mollison (Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay) joined in 1901 with headquarters at Nagpur The then government of Bengal had mooted in 1902 a proposal to the centre for setting up a model cattle farm for improving the dilapidated condition of the livestock at Pusa estate where plenty of land, water and feed would be available, and with Mr. Mollison’s support this was accepted in principle. Around Pusa, there were many British planters and also an indigo research centre Dalsing Sarai (near Pusa). Mr. Mollison’s visits to this mini British kingdom and his strong recommendations. In favour of Pusa as the most ideal place for the Bengal government project obviously caught the attention for the viceroy.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    RESPONSE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    (DRPCAU, PUSA, 2021) KUMAR, DEEPAK; Kumar, Amrendra
    This field experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of year 2020-21 on potato crop with variety Kufri Lalit to test the “Response of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)” at Research farm of TCA, Dholi (Muzaffarpur), Bihar. The treatment combination is i.e., T1 - control, T2 – 50 % RDF, T3 – 100 % RDF, T4 - Crop residue incorporation (Rice straw 5t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Azotobacter, PSB, Trichoderma viride 5kg/ha each), T5 - T4 + FYM 25t/ha, T6 - T4 + Vermicompost 7.5 t/ha, T7 - T4 + Neem cake 5t/ha, T8 - T4 + Poultry manure 3 t/ha. This experiment has conducted in randomized block design and thrice replicated it. The texture of experimental site was sandy loam with slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 8.31), low in organic carbon (0.47%) and available N (254 kg/ha). However, moderate in availability of P (17.4 kg/ha) and K (129.3 kg/ha), respectively. All growth and yield parameter like percent emergence, plant's height, shoot's number/plant, leave's number/plant, dry matter accumulation, tuber's bulking rate, yield attributes and yield were significantly influenced by the organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. Among all treatments, treatment T6 - T4 + Vermicompost 7.5 t/ha recorded higher per cent emergence (95.99 %), plant's height (43.10), shoot's number/plant (5.47), leave's number/plant (54.60), dry matter accumulation (84.80 g/plant), tuber's bulking rate (7.48 g/plant/day), tuber yield (24.12 t/ha) and treatment T6 also recorded statistically at par with treatment T3, T5. Total uptake of N (142.75 kg/ha), P (25.41 kg/ha) and K (140.37 kg/ha) by crop and available N (248 kg/ha), P (23.1 kg/ha) and K (174 kg/ha) in soil after harvest of the crop recorded highest in treatment T6. In case of economic study, the highest net returns (2,11,587 ₹/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.77) recorded from inorganic treatment T3 (100 % RDF). However, uppermost tuber yield (24.12 t/ha) and gross return (2,91,535 ₹/ha) were obtained from treatment T6 - Crop residue incorporation (Rice straw 5t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Azotobacter, PSB, Trichoderma viride 5kg/ha each) + Vermicompost (7.5t/ha). Treatment T6 also found statistically at par in terms of tuber's yield, gross return with treatment T3 (100 % RDF- 150:90:100 kg/ha NPK) tuber's yield (23.83 t/ha), gross return (2,88,099 ₹/ha) and with treatment T5 - Crop residue incorporation (Rice straw 5t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Azotobacter, PSB, Trichoderma viride 5kg/ha each) + FYM (25t/ha) tuber's yield (22.53 t/ha), gross return (2,72,380 ₹/ha). Conclusively organic treatments were not comparable with inorganic RDF treatment in terms of benefit cost ratio due to higher cost of organic inputs.