Loading...
Thumbnail Image

University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru

University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, a premier institution of agricultural education and research in the country, began as a small agricultural research farm in 1899 on 30 acres of land donated by Her Excellency Maharani Kempa Nanjammanni Vani Vilasa Sannidhiyavaru, the Regent of Mysore and appointed Dr. Lehmann, German Scientist to initiate research on soil crop response with a Laboratory in the Directorate of Agriculture. Later under the initiative of the Dewan of Mysore Sir M. Vishweshwaraiah, the Mysore Agriculture Residential School was established in 1913 at Hebbal which offered Licentiate in Agriculture and later offered a diploma programme in agriculture during 1920. The School was upgraded to Agriculture Collegein 1946 which offered four year degree programs in Agriculture. The Government of Mysore headed by Sri. S. Nijalingappa, the then Chief Minister, established the University of Agricultural Sciences on the pattern of Land Grant College system of USA and the University of Agricultural Sciences Act No. 22 was passed in Legislative Assembly in 1963. Dr. Zakir Hussain, the Vice President of India inaugurated the University on 21st August 1964.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    AN ANALYSIS OF FARMERS’ PARTICIPATION IN EFFECTIVE CANAL IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT IN KRISHNA COMMAND AREA
    (UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES GKVK, BENGALURU, 2019-12-23) AKKAMAHADEVI, NAIK; SHIVAMURTHY, M.
    The present study was conducted in Krishna Command Area at Vijayapura, Kalaburagi and Yadgiri districts of Karnataka during 2017-18. Data were collected from a sample of hundred head reach and hundred tail-end farmers of D-6 and D-11 distributories. The results revealed that, majority of the head reach farmers had moderate (41.00 %) followed by poor (35.00 %) and better (24.00 %) level of participation in effective canal irrigation management. In tail-end location, 45.00 per cent of farmers had moderate followed by better (32.00 %) and poor (23.00 %) level of participation. Regarding performance of Water Users Cooperative Societies, eight WUCS were selected randomly, in that four WUCS belonged moderate (50.00 %) followed by two had better (25.00 %) and two had poor (25.00 %) performance level. Coping mechanisms adopted by the head reach farmers that have adopted frequent cleaning of field channels and strictly following warabandi schedule. In tail-end farmers, cultivation of droughttolerant crops and cultivating less water consuming crops. Constraints expressed by the head reach farmers were inadequate training programmes conducted by WUCS and lack of knowledge on integrated crop management. Whereas, lack of support from irrigation department and obstruction to water flow from upper reach farmers were the constraints expressed by the tail-end farmers. Suggestions expressed by the head reach farmers were conduct adequate training programmes on water management and provide information on integrated crop management practices. Whereas, suggestions expressed by the tail-end farmers were proper support from irrigation department and coordination among the farmers to share water.