Thumbnail Image

Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University popularly known as HAU, is one of Asia's biggest agricultural universities, located at Hisar in the Indian state of Haryana. It is named after India's seventh Prime Minister, Chaudhary Charan Singh. It is a leader in agricultural research in India and contributed significantly to Green Revolution and White Revolution in India in the 1960s and 70s. It has a very large campus and has several research centres throughout the state. It won the Indian Council of Agricultural Research's Award for the Best Institute in 1997. HAU was initially a campus of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. After the formation of Haryana in 1966, it became an autonomous institution on February 2, 1970 through a Presidential Ordinance, later ratified as Haryana and Punjab Agricultural Universities Act, 1970, passed by the Lok Sabha on March 29, 1970. A. L. Fletcher, the first Vice-Chancellor of the university, was instrumental in its initial growth.

Browse

20142
Reset filters
Subject: Family Resource Management × Author: Sunita Kumari × Start date: 1994 × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Economic and Adoption Feasibility of Biomass Pellet Production Unit and Use of Pellet Stoves- A Pilot Study
    (CCSHAU, 2014) Sunita Kumari; Singal, Savita
    The present study was undertaken in village Kaimri of Hisar district, Haryana state. Study was conducted in four phases. Under phase-I, baseline survey on availability and use of fuels was conducted on 100 rural respondents. In phase-II, training on pellet making was imparted to ten rural women for 7 days and fifty women were trained in use of pellet stove. One pellet stove and 60- 70 kg. of pellets were distributed to selected fifty respondents for use for two months. Under phase-III, thermal efficiency of pellet stove was calculated by using the formula given by Sharma et al. (1988). In phase- IV, economic feasibility of pelletizing unit was calculated on the basis of cost-benefit ratio. Adoption feasibility of pelletizing unit and pellet stove was calculated with the help of scale given by Rogers and Shoemaker (1971). Majority of the respondents belonged to middle age (47.00%), were illiterate (43.00%) and had medium sized family. Wheat straw and cotton stalks were available in large quantities to respondents from medium and large land holding categories. Respondents used 5- 10 kg. of biomass fuel (59.00%) in traditional chulha which was collected on alternate day. Respondents faced ‘severe’ to ‘most severe’ problems in collection, fetching, storage and use of biomass fuels. Preexposure knowledge of the respondents regarding biomass pelletizing and use of pellet stove was found to be low. After imparting trainings, percentage gain in knowledge was 77.32 and 85.72 per cent for biomass pelletizing process and use of pellet stove, respectively. Thermal efficiency of pellet stove was found to be 44.93 per cent. Cost-benefit ratio of pelletizing unit was 1:2.27 which reflects it as an economically viable entrepreneurial unit. Adoption feasibility of pelletizing unit was 77.10 per cent on adoption feasibility index. Respondents used between 601-700 gm. of pellets at a time for preparing chapati/parantha, and heating of milk or water on it. Health benefits were perceived as ‘most beneficial’, followed by economical benefits and benefits related to use of pellet stove. Situational constraints like non-availability of kerosene oil and pellets ranked highest. Respondents considered pellet stove as ‘most feasible’ with 78.93 per cent on feasibility index.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Economic and Adoption Feasibility of Biomass Pellet Production Unit and Use of Pellet Stoves- A Pilot Study
    (CCSHAU, 2014) Sunita Kumari; Singal, Savita
    The present study was undertaken in village Kaimri of Hisar district, Haryana state. Study was conducted in four phases. Under phase-I, baseline survey on availability and use of fuels was conducted on 100 rural respondents. In phase-II, training on pellet making was imparted to ten rural women for 7 days and fifty women were trained in use of pellet stove. One pellet stove and 60- 70 kg. of pellets were distributed to selected fifty respondents for use for two months. Under phase-III, thermal efficiency of pellet stove was calculated by using the formula given by Sharma et al. (1988). In phase- IV, economic feasibility of pelletizing unit was calculated on the basis of cost-benefit ratio. Adoption feasibility of pelletizing unit and pellet stove was calculated with the help of scale given by Rogers and Shoemaker (1971). Majority of the respondents belonged to middle age (47.00%), were illiterate (43.00%) and had medium sized family. Wheat straw and cotton stalks were available in large quantities to respondents from medium and large land holding categories. Respondents used 5- 10 kg. of biomass fuel (59.00%) in traditional chulha which was collected on alternate day. Respondents faced ‘severe’ to ‘most severe’ problems in collection, fetching, storage and use of biomass fuels. Preexposure knowledge of the respondents regarding biomass pelletizing and use of pellet stove was found to be low. After imparting trainings, percentage gain in knowledge was 77.32 and 85.72 per cent for biomass pelletizing process and use of pellet stove, respectively. Thermal efficiency of pellet stove was found to be 44.93 per cent. Cost-benefit ratio of pelletizing unit was 1:2.27 which reflects it as an economically viable entrepreneurial unit. Adoption feasibility of pelletizing unit was 77.10 per cent on adoption feasibility index. Respondents used between 601-700 gm. of pellets at a time for preparing chapati/parantha, and heating of milk or water on it. Health benefits were perceived as ‘most beneficial’, followed by economical benefits and benefits related to use of pellet stove. Situational constraints like non-availability of kerosene oil and pellets ranked highest. Respondents considered pellet stove as ‘most feasible’ with 78.93 per cent on feasibility index.