Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Allelopathic effect of five weed species on protein in different varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2005-08) Badhani, Richa; Rao, P.B.
    Allelopathy is the beneficial or harmful effects of one plant on another plant, both crop and weed species by the release of chemicals from plant parts by leaching, root exudation, volatilization, decomposition and other process in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. Weeds are the plants which are unwanted and interfere with the productivity and yield of cultivated crops. In present study, allelopathic effect of five dominant weed species i.e. Ageratum conyzoides L., Cyprus rotundus L., Phalaris minor L., Polygonum hydropiper L, and Solanum nigrum L. extracts were examined on seed germination, seedling growth (length and dry weight), total protein content and protein profile in ten different varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and to identify resistant and susceptibile varieties i.e.,UP-2338,C-306,UP-299,PBW-373,UP-1109,PBW-343,UP-2382,UP-2113,PBW-175,PBW-396. The weed extracts exhibited both inhibitory as well as stimulatory effect on seed germination, plumule and radicle length and dry weight of total seedling in different varieties of wheat. On the basis of per cent reduction, the variety UP-2338 and PBW-396 (o) with P. minor were resistant and C-306 (68.96) with S. nigrum was susceptible. Similarly, UP-2338 (19.92) with S. nigrum was resistant and C-306 (94.34) with A.conyzoides was susceptible in radicle length: PBW- 396 (2.35) with P. minor and UP-299 (83.27) with S. nigrum in plumule length; UP-2338 (9.59) with C. rotundus and C-306 (94.25) with A. conyzoides in radicle dry weight, PBW-373 (0.25) with P. minor and PBW-343 (72.33) with P. hydropiper in plumule dry weight: UP-2113 (3.30) with C. rotundus and UP-1109 (81.18) with P. hydropiper in both seedling dry weight. Thus, these results indicate that the variety UP-2338 was most resistant compared to others. The total protein content was variable in all varieties in control and treatments. It was maximum in PBW-343 (7.8) with A. conyzoides and minimum in UP-1109 (1.3) with P. hydropiper. On the basis of total protein content variety C-306 and UP-299 were resistant and PBW-373 and UP-1109 were susceptible to most of the treatments. Results of similarity index indicate that the extracts of C. rotundus, P. minor and S. nigrum showed similar effect compared to other combinations.