Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Detection and quantification of chlorpyrifos and endosulphan residues in dead animal’s using high performance liquid chromatography
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2007-05) Tyagi, Amit; Dixit, V.P.
    In the present study, about 168 tissue samples were analyzed for the presence of endosulfan and chlorpyrifos residues and 74 for presence of monocrotophos using the standardized method. The residues were extracted by treating with acetonitirile followed by liquid-liquid partition with sodium sulfate solution (2.5%): dichloromethane. The extracts obtained after dehydration on sodium sulfate column were cleaned up by performing adsorption chromatography on alumina column. The detection and quantification of these residues was carried out with the help of High Performance Liquid Chromatography using Diode Array Detector. Five (7.14 %) out of 70 muscle, 2 (2.85 %) of 70 liver and none of 70 kidney tissues were detected positive for endosulfan α residues. Out of these none of the samples violated the prescribed limits given by CODEX. Only one (1.42 %) of muscle tissue sample out of 70 was detected positive for endosulfan β residues. Out of these also none of the samples violated the prescribed limits given by CODEX. Seven (10.00 %) of muscle tissue, 6 (8.57 %) of kidney and 2 (2.85 %) of liver were detected positive for endosulfan sulfate residues. Out of these total samples none of the samples violated the prescribed limits given by CODEX. Chlorpyrifos residues were detected in 5 (7.14 %) of 70 muscle samples, 4 (5.71 %) of 70 liver and none of kidney tissue was detected positive. None of these samples also violated the prescribed limits given by CODEX. All of the 121 samples analyzed for presence of monocrotophos were found negative.