Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in zoo animals of some Indian zoos
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2017-07) Niranjan, Anuruddha Singh; Singh, Vidya Sagar
    The present research was conducted to study the prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasites in the Zoo animals at Zoological Park, Nainital and Kanpur. A total of 333 faecal samples (99 samples from Nainital, Zoo and 234 samples from Kanpur, Zoo) were randomly collected. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection were 28.28% and 32.05% whereas, prevalence of helminths, protozoans and mixed infection were 20.20%, 7.07%, 1.01% and 20.94%, 8.11%, 2.99% for Zoological Parks, Nainital and Kanpur respectively. The results for Zoological Park, Nainital indicated that the helminth infections were more compared to protozoans and mixed infection in herbivores, carnivores and some birds. The prevalence of helminths and protozoans in carnivores were 20.83%, 4.16% respectively and for herbivores were 27.77%, 16.66% and mixed infection 5.55% respectively. Gastrointestinal parasites (eggs/cysts/oocysts) identified in herbivores were Strongyle sp., Capillaria sp. (11.11%), Trichuris sp., Muellerius sp. (5.55%) and Eimeria sp. (16.66%). EPG/CPG/OPG ranged from 100 to 500. Gastrointestinal parasites (eggs/cysts/oocysts) identified in carnivores were Toxocara cati (12.50%), Toxocara canis (8.33%) and Isospora sp.(4.16%). EPG/CPG/OPG ranged from 150 to 450. Common Peafowls were found positive with Ascaridia galli (18.18%) and Eimeria sp. (3.63%). The results for Zoological Park, Kanpur indicated that the helminth infections were more than protozoan and mixed infection in herbivores, carnivores, omnivores and non-human primates. The prevalence of helminths, protozoans and mixed infection in carnivores were 34.42%, 6.55% and 3.27% respectively, for herbivores, 16.93%, 4.83% and 3.22% repectively, for non-human primates 13.33% and 20%. Gastrointestinal parasites (eggs/cysts/oocysts) identified in herbivores were Amphistome (2.41%), Fasciola sp. (1.61%), Trichuris sp. (3.22%), Strongyle sp., Strongyloides sp., Oesophagostomum sp., Trichostrongylus sp.(2.41%) and Eimeria sp. (4.83%). EPG/CPG/OPG was ranged from 50to350. Gastrointestinal parasites (eggs/cysts/oocysts) identified in carnivores were Ancylostoma sp. (8.19%), Toxocara cati (8.19%), Strongyloides sp. (6.55%), Trichuris sp. (4.91%) Toxocara canis (3.27%), Toxascaris leonina (1.63%), Spirometra sp. (1.63%) and Isospora sp. (6.55%). EPG/CPG/OPG were ranged from 100 to 600. Gastrointestinal parasites (eggs/cysts/oocysts) identified in non-human primates were Strongyloides sp. (13.33%) and Eimeria sp. (20%). EPG/CPG/OPG were ranged from 200 to 350. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in the present study was 30.93% with 21.02% samples positive with helminths, 7.80% samples positive with protozoans and 2.10% samples positive with mixed infection. The overall prevalence of helminths, protozoans and mixed infection in herbivore were 18.30%, 6.33% and 3.52%, in carnivores were 30.58%, 5.88% and 2.35%, in non-human primates helminths and protozoan prevalence were 12.76% and 21.27% and in wild birds were 18.18% and 3.63% respectively. The overall prevalence of helminths in omnivores was 0.60%. There was no protozoan and mixed infection. Looking to the incidence of gastro-intestinal parasites kept in captivity it can be concluded that there is a need for detailed epidemiological investigation on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites by regular screening of faecal samples in Zoo animals with respect to season, age, climate etc. Based on the prevalence of parasites deworming with suitable anthelmintic is required. Proper hygienic measures for the control of different stages of parasites need to be taken care of so as to reduce the parasitic infection in Zoo animals.