Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Runoff estimation from a small watershed using GIUH approach in a GIS environment
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2005-07) Nema, Manish Kumar; Singh, J.K.
    The conventional techniques of derivation of unit hydrographs require historical rainfall- runoff data. In a developing country like India, the most of the small watersheds are still ungauged; hence adequate runoff data are not generally available. For such type of catchments tedious procedure of regionalization of model parameters are sought. The research in the field of fluvial geomorphology of the problems facing the hydrologist today, in this regard the concept of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) has been introduced. Wherein the characteristics of instantaneous unit hydrograph are related to the geomorphological and climatic characteristics of the watershed. The major advantage of this approach is that this linking of geomorphologic parameters with the hydrologic characteristics of the watershed can lead to a simple and useful procedure to simulate the hydrologic behavior of various catchments, particularly ungauged ones. In the present study the geomorphologic characteristics of Kothuwatari watershed, a sub-watershed of upper Damodar Valley, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India have been estimated from the toposheets 72H/7 and 72H/8 by using the GIS software ILWIS 3.0. The GIUH based Clark and Nash models have been used for the simulation of nine storm events. The direct surface runoff (DSRO) hydrographs derived by both the models have been compared with the observed DSRO hydrographs. The performance of the models for the study area has been evaluated by employing performance indices viz., (i) absolute relative error, (ii) Absolute percentage deviation in peak flow rates, (iii) coefficient of efficiency, (iv) absolute average error, (v) root mean square error and (vi) average error in volume. The results of the study showed that both the developed models provide a reasonably good estimate of direct surface runoff based on these performance indices. However it was difficult to conclude that which model performs better for the study area as based on percentage absolute deviation in peak and average error in volume, the GIUH based Clark model was found better while based on rest of the indices the GIUH based Nash model was found better.