Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Runoff and sediment yield modelling using soil and water assessment tool for management planning of Mojo Watershed, Ethiopia
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2016-01) Gonfa, Zelalem Biru; Devendra Kumar
    Physically based Soil and water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was setup and evaluated to assess runoff and sediment yield from Mojo watershed (2017.21 km2) situated in Central Oromia Regional state, Ethiopia. In this study for stream flow simulation parameters involving surface runoff (CN2.mgt) and ground water (ALPHA_BNK.rte) are found the most sensitive parameter and the parameters representing soil (USLE_K.sol) and surface runoff (SPCON.bsn), were found more sensitive for sediment yield simulation. A good agreement between observed and simulated discharge were observed, which was verified using both graphical technique and quantitative statistics. The value of R2=0.83, NSE=0.82, RSR=0.42 and PBIAS=10.5 obtained during calibration and R2 value 0.77, NSE value 0.75, RSR value 0.50 and PBIAS 9.8 obtained during validation as well as the uniformly scatter points along the 1:1 line during calibration and validation justify that the model is very good in simulating runoff. For sediment yield the computed statistical indicators R2=0.76, NSE=0.75, RSR=0.50 and PBIAS = 8.10 were obtained during calibration and during validation the computed statistical indicators were found 0.79 for R2, 0.71 for NSE, 0.54 for RSR and 35.83 for PBIAS. Based on SWAT model output a multi-objective linear programming model was developed to solve several conflicting objectives and to optimize simultaneously considering minimizing soil erosion and maximizing benefit as an objective function and area under different Land use as a constraint. Accordingly, a reduction of dry land farming by 18.45% and increasing the current rangeland 946.36 ha to 15419.74 ha and 45.96 ha under irrigated agriculture to 25526.69 ha would increase the net income and minimize soil erosion from the watershed by 29.91% and 16.14% respectively without making much difference of the current forest land. Furthermore, a decision support system and methodology was developed for the identification land capability classification of each HRUs and to suggest various watershed management practices based on the identified land capability classification.