Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Hydrological response of a watershed using unit-step and transfer functions based mathematical models
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2007-12) Pravendra Kumar; Singh, J.K.
    Present study has been carried out for estimation of storm runoff for the Karkara watershed with an area of 17.51 km2 of Tilaiya dam catchment in Upper Damodar Valley using the concept of unit-step and transfer functions. The conceptual models (discrete linear input-output models) having two parameters namely; Lag and Route model (LAR), Variable Storage Coefficient Model with cascade of two linear reservoirs in series (VSC-I) and Variable Storage Coefficient Model with cascade of three linear reservoirs in series (VSC-II) and Muskingum model for single reach (MSR) considering the system as lumped, linear and time-invariant have been developed for the study watershed. Twelve single peaked and isolated storm events have been analyzed in this study, out of which nine storm events were selected for calibration and remaining three events for the prediction purposes. The parameters of LAR model were estimated by the method of cumulants. The parameters of VSC-I, VSC-II and MSR models were estimated by methods as suggested by Sabol (1988) and Nash (1957). The autocorrelation functions of the residuals (observed – predicted) lie within the lines of confidence, that is, 2 SE lines confirming adequacy of the models for the study watershed. The visual comparison between observed and predicted direct runoff hydrographs showed that the MSR-II model (Channel routing with X = 0.10) resulted in the closest agreement for the study watershed. Based on quantitative performance evaluation indices also, the Muskingum single reach model, MSR-II was found to be the best performing model for the estimation of direct runoff hydrograph in the study watershed. The lowest average value of percentage absolute deviation in peak runoff rate of 4.629 further confirms the applicability of MSR-II model for the study watershed. However, the higher values of coefficient of efficiency of 0.90 and above and coefficient of determination and lower values of integral square error, relative squared error, percentage absolute deviation in peak runoff rates and direct runoff volumes indicate higher degree of goodness of fit of all the models for the study watershed. Based on the performance, it is concluded that the developed models can also be used with acceptable degree of accuracy for ungauged watersheds situated in areas having hydro-meteorological and geographical conditions similar to Karkara watershed.