Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

20191
Reset filters
Subject: Genetics and Plant Breeding × Author: Adhikari, Sneha × End date: 2019 × Start date: 2017 ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Characterization and QTL mapping of Teosinte derived maize population for BLSB resistance and other traits
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2019-08) Adhikari, Sneha; Singh, N.K.
    The investigation was carried out with the aim to map genomic region for resistance to banded leaf and sheath blight and other traits. The field experiments were conducted during rabi 2016-2017, kharif 2017, rabi 2017-18 for development of mapping population while kharif 2018 season was used for phenotyping of BC1F5 mapping population under artificially inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani and control conditions. Among BC1F3 and BC1F4 generation of teosinte derived maize population, large phenotypic variation was observed for all morphological traits, hence teosinte can be used for enhancing maize germplasm. Of the 126 lines 76, 20 and 21 lines were of protogynous behaviour, short ASI (0-1 days) and bears > 3 ears per plant, respectively in both BC1F3 and BC1F4 generations. Jaccard similarity coefficients and dendrogram generated using SSR markers data indicate 25 percent genetic similarity in maize and teosinte. Analysis of variance showed highly significant variation among the BC1F5 lines for disease reactions and other traits. Among 169 BC1F5 lines, 9 (MT-25, MT-90, MT-99, MT-128, MT-136, MT-144, MT-145, MT-148, MT-152) comes under the category of moderately resistant class and can be utilize in maize BLSB resistance breeding. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant variance between the environment for days to anthesis and silking, anthesis-silking interval (ASI), flag leaf length, flag leaf width, ear per plant, ear length, ear diameter, kernel rows per ear, kernels per row, test weight and grain yield per plant. It indicates greater impact of disease stress on these characters. Correlation analysis exhibited significant correlation of BLSB resistance with flag leaf angle, plant height, ear length, ear diameter, kernel rows per ear, kernels per row, test weight and grain yield per plant. The single-marker ANOVA revealed a total 125 QTLs, of these 4 were major and 121 were minor QTLs for 14 traits. These QTLs were distributed over 10 chromosomes with phenotypic variation ranges from 2.29 to 12.98 per cent. Out of 125 QTLs, 64 and 61 QTLs were detected in E1 and E2, respectively and of which 20 QTLs were common in both the environments. Maximum QTLs were detected in chromosomes 4 and 9 followed by 7, 6, 10, 5, 2, 1, 3 and 8. Consistent QTLs across the environments were identified for days to anthesis (3), days to silking (2), flag leaf length (1), flag leaf width (1), plant height (2), ears per plant (1), node bearing first ear (2), ear length (2), ear diameter (1), kernel rows per ear (3), test weight (1) and grain yield per plant (1). The single-marker ANOVA analysis revealed one major QTL on chromosome 5 and four minor on chromosomes 1, 3, 4 and 8 for BLSB resistance under DE1. In DE2 however only four minor QTLs one each on chromosomes 1, 3, 5 and 8 were identified. Out of these nine QTLs two were identified across the environments that were linked with markers umc1500 and phi10918, considered as stable QTLs. Among seven identified QTLs for BLSB resistance, a major QTL linked with phi10918 was colocalized with three minor QTLs for ear length, kernel rows per ear and kernels per row. Seven minor QTLs for days to anthesis, days to silking, ear length, ear diameter, kernel rows per ear, kernels per row and grain yield per plant were co-localized with a minor QTL for BLSB resistance that linked with marker umc1720. One minor QTL for BLSB resistance that was linked with phi420701 was collocated with a major QTL for plant height. Remaining two minor QTLs for BLSB resistance namely, umc1500-linked QTL and umc2000-linked QTL were colocalized with QTL for test weight and ear per plant, respectively. The investigation successfully identified lines with desirable traits that can be utilized in stress resistance breeding. Co-localized QTLs identified for various morphological traits and disease resistance can integrate/pyramid in breeding materials for improving BLSB resistance.