Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    A study on adoption of soil health management practices by farmers in Mayurbhanj district of Odisha
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2013-07) Mohapatra, Lalatendu; Kameswari, V.L.V.
    Deterioration of soil health through excessive and imbalanced use of chemical fertilizers is a serious issue during the post green revolution era. Knowledge about the nature and extent of the problem on the part of the farmers is an important constraint in adoption of Soil Health Management Practices. Hence, the present study was carried out in Mayurbhanj district of Odisha state during February-March, 2013 in two villages, viz; Telibila & Rangamatia to study economic, socio-personal and communication characteristics of farmers in the study area, to measure the knowledge level & extent of adoption regarding selected Soil Health Management Practices by farmers, to study the relationship between knowledge level and extent of adoption, to find out the relationship between Socio Economic Status and extent of adoption and to identify the constraints in adoption of the selected Soil Health Management Practices. Farmers were selected randomly following probability proportionate to size criterion. A total of 90 farmers were selected. It was found that majority (53.34%) of the farmers belong to medium Socio Economic Status. Majority (64.44%) respondents had medium level of knowledge regarding selected SHM practices. About one fifth (21.12%) respondents had low level of knowledge followed by 14.44% respondents who had high level of knowledge regarding SHM practices. Majority (58.88%) respondents showed medium extent of adoption followed by 22.22% who had high and 18.89% who had low extent of adoption. Use of compost was found to be maximum and was adopted by 42.22% respondents followed by adoption of Acid Soil Amendment (ASM) by 38.88%. Use of phosphate in compost pit was not followed by 80% respondents and bio-fertilizer application was not adopted by 66.66%. Soil testing and soil sample collection were discontinued by 37.77% respondents. Independent variables such as education, annual income, land holding, social participation and extension participation were positively associated with extent of adoption, where as age and institutional participation were negatively associated. There existed a positive and significant relation between knowledge and adoption. Major problem faced by farmers in adoption of soil testing technology was difficulty in understanding and following soil test based recommendations. The other constraints in adoption of SHM practices were uncertainty in yield gain, long procedure involved in testing and the non availability of test results on time. Regarding INM adoption major constraints were lack of knowledge about recommended dose of nutrients, lack of awareness about bio-fertilizer and micro-nutrients and non availability of bio-fertilizers. Major constraints behind non adoption of ASM were lack of availability of amendments and lack of proper knowledge about its’ use. The study indicates that there is need to train farmers on application of bio-fertilizer and ASM. Report of soil test should made available to the farmer without much delay and in an easy language.