Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    A comparative study on adoption of conservation agriculture practices by wheat growing farmers in Northern India
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. PIN - 263145, 2022-09) Bardhan, Tannishtha; Bhardwaj, Neelam
    Post green revolution era has countersigned a number of alterations and challenges in Indian agriculture due to practicing of intensive cultivation techniques. Sustainability issues with respect to agro-ecology and soil health were questioned seriously.The multifaceted interaction of population growth, technological advancement and climate change cripples Indian agriculture to a great extent. Conservation Agriculture (CA) practices were looked upon as next best alternative to regain sustainability. Conservation Agriculture (CA) as defined by FAO (2014) is an approach to manage agro-ecosystems for improved and sustained productivity, increased profits and food security while preserving and enhancing the resource base and the environment.Understanding the prospects of CA, significant efforts have been made by CGIAR institutes in close collaboration with National Agricultural Research and Extension Systems (NARES) resulting in its adoption in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India.But even after 15 years of introduction of CA technologies, majority of the Indian farmers are still partially adopting CA techniques. Small and marginal farmers are still the untouched segment with respect to adoption of CA practices. Behavioural change among the farmers can be inculcated by altering the existing attitude of farmers towards CA practices. Keeping all these issue in the frontline the present research study was undertaken. Punjab and Haryana being the wheat basket of India introduced the cultivation of Zero-tilled wheat in the last decade as these two states were facing the problems of depleting ground water table, formation of hard pan under soil, enhanced soil salinity, residue burning issues and nutrient deficiency. These factors directly or indirectly swayed the sporadic adoption of CA practices in rice-wheat cropping system in these two states. For that reason, the states of Punjab and Haryana were selected purposively for the study keeping in mind the fact that a good information and data can be generated about CA adopter and non-adopter farmers. One district from each state was purposively selected i.e. Karnal in Haryana and Ludhiana from Punjab. From each selected districts, two blocks were again purposively chosen based on the afore-mentioned criteria. In present study, three villages from each block were picked up through Simple Random Sampling without replacement method. Ten CA adopter farmers and ten CA non-adopter farmers were randomly selected from each village and thus total sample size was 240. The present study concluded that CA adopter farmers differed significantly from CA non-adopter farmers with respect to majority of the socio-economic, communicational and psychological attributes. Majority of the CA non-adopters being small and marginal farmers were having least risk taking ability to make a shift from conventional tillage based practices to zero tilled cultivation. This variation in the socio-economic attributes affect the innovation decision and adoption process of the farmers. Comparing with the non-adopter farmers, CA adopters were having better knowledge and more favourable outlook towards CA practices in wheat. Impact of different behavioural drivers on the adoption of CA e h t g n i v i e c r e p , e d u t i t t a e v i t i s o p g n i v a H . g n i l l e d o M l a n o i t a u q E l a r u t c u r t S g n i s u s p u o r g g n i m r a f e h t h t o b r o f d e i d u t s s a wu sefulness of this technology and comprehending the relative advantage of CA over tillage based cultivation mainly influenced the intention and behaviour of the CA adopter farmers. While for non-adopter farmers, apart from attitude, perceived usefulness and relative advantage of CA, subjective norms also played a significant role in shaping the intention to adopt the new technology. The study also summarized that the benefits as perceived by the adopter farmers could be divided into two groups: economical and environmental. Perceptual mapping of perceived benefits revealed that major beneficial aspects of CA are improvement in the soil health, decline in the cost of cultivation, lodging resistance of wheat, climate resilience and improvement in the grain quality. On the other hand, the bottlenecks like greater weed and pest infestation, stereotypic mind set of the farmers, limited access to productive resources, lack of proper information etc, pulled back non-adopter farmers to try and practice CA practices in wheat. The study also documented some plausible strategies from subject matter experts to overcome these barriers. The study findings emphasize on the fact that blanket application of CA practices is not a feasible option and hence policy makers should rethink and realign the approaches and develop suitable framework to promote CA practices holistically. The strategies must be need based, demand driven, tailored to specific locale and target oriented and then only it could help in achieving sustainability and resiliency of thefarm and the farming system as a whole