Screening of pigeonpea genotypes against podfly, melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) and assessment of damage by blister beetle, mylabris pustulata thunberg

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2008
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
CCSHAU
Abstract
Screening of pigeonpea genotypes against pod fly revealed that out of 20 genotypes, none was found completely resistant, however marked differences were noticed among different pigeonpea genotypes. The pod and grain damage of different pigeonpea genotypes ranged from 2.77 to 15.16% and 2.4% to 8.55%, respectively. Three genotypes HDM 04-1, H 2000-47 and AL-1493 were promising as they recorded lowest pod (2.77-5.93%) and grain (2.4-8.55%) damage and were considered suitable for incorporation into breeding programe for pod fly resistance. The data on days to 50% flowering revealed that there is no correlation between days to 50% flowering and pod fly incidence. The results achieved on morphological and biochemical parameters of genotypes revealed that trichome density and length of pods were negatively correlated with podfly incidence. The biochemica constituents of seeds of pigeonpea genotypes revealed that total sugars, total phenols, tannins and potassium content showed negative correlation with pod fly incidence. Protein and phosphorus content showed positive correlation with pod fly incidence and are responsible for susceptibility to podfly. Studies on population of blister beetle on different pigenpea genotypes revealed that it was found to be highest at the time of maximum flowering and decreases with flower shedding and pod formation. Seasonal mean beetle population was found to be maximum in H 2004-24 (5.9 beetles/plot) and lowest in AL-1489 (2.7 beetles/plot). Results achieved on flower damaged by the blister beetle under laboratory condition revealed the damage ranging from 16.6 to 27.5 per cent on 20 test genotypes. However, there was no significant yield differences in the caged and uncaged cultivars.
Description
Keywords
Irrigation, Irrigation scheduling, Yields, curd, crops, vegetative propagation, Soil water content, Cauliflowers, Biological development, Nutrients
Citation