STUDIES ON STANDARDIZATION OF PROTEIN FORTIFIED PAPAYA BASED MIXED FRUIT BAR

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2019-09-16
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE, VENKATARAMANNAGUDEM, W.G.Dist.- 534 101 ANDHRA PRADESH
Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Studies on standardization of protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar” was carried out in the Department of Post Harvest Technology at College of Horticulture, Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh during September 2018 to March 2019 with an objective to study the effect of pulp blends, packaging materials and protein concentrations on quality and shelf life of protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar and also to assess the economic viability of different fruit blends, packaging material and protein concentrations of papaya based mixed fruit bar. Two experiments were conducted in Factorial Completely Randomized Design with factors viz., fruit blends and packaging materials at unequal levels and replicated thrice. The physico-chemical properties and organoleptic quality of protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar were evaluated at 30 days intervals up to 90th day of storage period. It was observed that moisture content, total soluble solids, reducing sugars and titrable acidity showed increasing trend throughout the storage period whereas, the non-reducing sugars, total sugars, protein, ascorbic acid, beta carotene and organoleptic characteristics exhibited decreasing trend during storage of the protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar. In the first experiment, among the pulp blends and packaging materials, the fruit bar prepared from 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp packed in PET bottles (B1P1) was superior in terms of low moisture percentage (15.10%) and better retention of TSS (81.25oB), reducing sugars (42.07%), total sugars (68.23%), non reducing sugars (26.16%), flavour (8.83), texture (8.87), taste (8.86) and overall acceptability score (8.88). The fruit bar prepared from the 100% papaya pulp (B5) recorded high content of ascorbic acid (63.86 mg/100g), beta- carotene (1595 µg/100g), colour score (8.85) and appearance score (8.92). The bar prepared with 50% papaya pulp+40% banana pulp+10% sapota pulp packed in PET bottles (B4P1) recorded the high protein (0.84%) and titrable acidity (1.53%). B:C ratio was high (3.08) in the fruit bar prepared from 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp packed in LDPE covers (B1P2). In the second experiment, among the protein concentrations, the fruit bar prepared from 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp fortified with 5% whey protein (C1) was recorded as most acceptable treatment throughout the storage period from initial day to 90th day of storage at ambient conditions. It has recorded higher retention of titrable acidity (1.24), taste (8.89), texture (8.87), flavour (8.89) and overall acceptability score (8.57). The fruit bar prepared with 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp and fortified with 20% whey protein packed in PET bottles (C4) was observed high content of TSS (82.11oB), reducing sugars (44.53%), non reducing sugars (4.47%), total sugars (68.28%) and protein (15.48 %). The fruit bar prepared with 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp fortified with 5% soya protein (C5) has recorded low moisture content (15.57%), ascorbic acid (43.06 mg/100g), high colour and appearance values (8.85 and 8.89), respectively. Maximum B:C ratio (2.80) was recorded in the fruit bar prepared with 50% papaya pulp+10% banana pulp+40% sapota pulp and fortified with 20 % whey protein packed in PET bottles (C4).
Description
 Fruit bar fortified with dessicatted coconut powder, nuts and skim milk powder may be tried.  Investigations on the improvement of shelf life of fruit bars is still required.  Storage of the protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar in different storage temperatures can also be evaluated.  Different packaging can be tried to store the fruit bar.  Different drying methods can be tried in protein fortified papaya based mixed fruit bar.  Low concentrations of protein need to be tried for preparation fortified bars.  Blending with the fruit pulp of antioxidant rich fruits like jamun, aonla etc., can be explored
Keywords
Citation
Collections