Economic Analysis Of Production And Marketing Of Mushrooms

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2000
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara
Abstract
The present study entitled the Economics of Production and Marketing of Mushroom was undertaken during the year 1999-2000. This study was conducted in Thiruvananthapuram district. This district was purposely selected for the study because mushroom growmg units on commercial basis are well established ill Thiruvananthapuram district. A sample of 100 growers who maintained contact with the training centres was selected. Each farmer was interviewed personally. Among the 100 sample farmers 36 were cultivating mushrooms and the remaining had given up cultivation. All the mushroom growers were post-stratified on the basis of nature of investment into Category-I (Temporary upto Rs.15000 ), Category-IT (Semi-permanent Rs.15000-25000) and Category-Ill (Permanent above Rs.25000) Tabular analysis was used to study the socio-economic features, to estimate the cost and returns, marketing cost and margins of mushrooms. Cost concepts were used to estimate the income measures. At aggregate level the total cost incurred for cultivation of mushroom was Rs. 8167.83. Material inputs accounted for about 82.85 per cent of the total working capital requirement for the sample as a whole. Hired labour component was absent in category-I. At aggregate level this accounted for 17.15 per cent total working capital requirement. Total working capital requirement for mushroom production was Rs. 3738.51. As compared to males, females were more in the working force, which shows the women's participation in mushroom cultivation. Explicit costs accounted for 45.77 percent of the total cost. Implicit cost accounted for 54.23 per cent of the total cost. Cost A], Bj, Cl, and C3 per crop cycle for the sample as a whole was Rs. 4144.95, Rs. 4522.91, Rs. 1425.30 and Rs. 8167.83. The total working capital requirement for producing 1 kilogram of spawn was Rs. 12.83. Explicit cost accounted for 71.60 per cent of the total cost. Implicit cost accounted for 28.40 per cent of the total cost. Cost AI, B), Cl, and C3 per kilogram' of spawn Rs. 14.25, Rs. 14.49, and Rs. 16.29, 17.92 respectively. Gross income from mushroom for the sample as a whole was Rs. 12118.60. Gross income from spawn production was Rs. 40.00 for one kilogram of , spawn. Farm business income was Rs. 7973.65 for mushroom production and farm business income of spawn was Rs 25.75. For the sample as a whole the family labour income was Rs. 7595.69. and Rs. 25.51 in the case of spawn production .. The net income from mushrooms was Rs. 3950.77 and from spawn production it was Rs. 22.08. Farm investment income was Rs. 4328.73 and Rs. 22.32 for mushrooms and spawn production. The Benefit-Cost ratio was 1.48. The operating ratio which represents the efficiency of variable costs was 0.31. Aggregate fixed ratio was 0.21. The Benefit-Cost ratio in spawn production was 2.23. The operating ratio was 0.32. Fixed ratio was 0.08 Cobb Douglas production function fitted with returns (rupees) as dependent variable and expenditure on inputs like straw, spawn and labour as independent variables revealed that additional expenditure on straw and spawn could increase the output. The input human labour was found to be in' excess use. The most important marketing channel identified for mushroom was . , Producer-Consumer. Producers share in consumer rupee was 75 per cent. The retailer reaped a net margin of25 per cent for which they did not incurred any cost. The major constraint faced by mushroom growers in production was low yield due to incidence of pest and diseases and among the marketing problems the major constraint identified was lack of awareness among consumers.
Description
PG
Keywords
Citation
171778
Collections