Diversity and Management of Insect pests in Bt and non-Bt cotton

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2018
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MPUAT, Udaipur
Abstract
Diversity and management of insect pests in Bt and non-Bt cotton Anusha Surakasula* Dr. R. Swaminathan* Investigations on “Diversity and management of insect pests in Bt and non-Bt cotton” were carried out in the Department of Entomology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur, during the kharif seasons 2015 and 2016 with a view to record the comparative seasonal incidence of major insect pests; estimate the occurrence and diversity of associated natural enemies; and evaluate insecticide schedules to manage the insect pests in Bt and non-Bt cotton. The major insect pests comprised the sap feeding guild: aphids, jassids/ leaf hoppers, thrips and whiteflies as major, while mealy bugs, the red and dusky cotton bugs as minor pests. Infestation by aphids, leaf hoppers, thrips and whiteflies initiated from third week of June to first week of July. The aphid population reached a peak in the last week of September during kharif 2015 and 2016; whereas, leafhopper, thrips and whiteflies attained the peak population in the third to last week of August. The mealy bug, red and dusky * Ph. D. Scholar, Department of Entomology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur. ** Professor , Department of Entomology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur cotton bugs appeared in the later part of the crop growth period in both years. The leaf hopper population evinced a significant positive correlation with relative humidity in Bt and non-Bt cotton; likewise, the population of thrips (in Bt and non-Bt cotton) and whiteflies (Bt and non-Bt cotton) showed a significant positive correlation with relative humidity. The populations of leaf hopper (Bt and non-Bt cotton) and thrips (Bt cotton) had a significant positive correlation with the mean atmospheric temperature during kharif 2016. Leaf hopper population had a significant negative correlation with the hours of sunshine in both Bt and non-Bt cotton. The more common natural enemies included coccinellids, spiders and syrphid larvae that were relatively more in the month of September (Bt and non-Bt cotton) during both the crop seasons. Mantid population was high during September (kharif 2015) and October (kharif 2016) in Bt and non-Bt cotton. The coccinellid population showed a significant positive correlation with relative humidity in non-Bt cotton during 2015. During kharif 2016, the syrphid larval population exhibited a significant positive correlation with the mean atmospheric temperature in Bt and non-Bt cotton. The aphidiphagous coccinellids and syrphid larval population showed a significant positive correlation with the aphid population during both seasons in Bt (r=0.830 and 0.796 during kharif 2015; r=0.781 and 0.911 during kharif 2016) and non-Bt cotton (r=0.697 and 0.725 during kharif 2015; r=0.807 and 0.937 during kharif 2016) depicting a density-dependent predator-prey activity. During both the crop seasons (kharif 2015 and 2016), among the insect pests the relative density was the maximum for aphids (48.26 and 35.58 % in Bt cotton & 39.28 and 12.48 % in non-Bt cotton); among the natural enemies it was the maximum for coccinellids (54.99 and 59.36 % in Bt cotton & 59.64 and 62.11 % in non-Bt cotton). The indices of diversity, Shannon and Simpson, were relatively more for insect pests in non-Bt cotton; whereas, for the natural enemies in Bt cotton. In Bt cotton, imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ha) significantly reduced the populations of aphids (up to 85.61% in 2015 & 86.25% in 2016) and whiteflies (up to 73.18% in 2015 & 73.38% in 2016) after first spray; whereas, fipronil 70 WG (100 g/ha) was significantly effective in reducing the populations of leafhoppers (up to 76.98% in 2015 & 80.59% in 2016) and thrips (up to 81.28% in 2015 & 80.14% in 2016); however, after the second spray, imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ha) showed a significant reduction in the population of aphids (up to 76.52% in 2015 & 73.43% in 2016), leaf hoppers (up to 75.35% in 2015 & 80.33% in 2016), thrips (up to 71.06% in 2015 & 73.31% in 2016) and whiteflies (up to 72.66% in 2015 & 76.44% in 2016). In non-Bt cotton, after the first and second spray, imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ha) was effective in reducing aphids (first spray: up to 80.89% in 2015 & 82.09% in 2016; second spray: up to 76.21% in 2015 & 74.40% in 2016), leafhoppers (first spray: up to 83.63% in 2015 & 80.39% in 2016; second spray: up to 78.01% in 2015 & 77.51% in 2016), thrips (first spray: up to 75.92% in 2015 & 78.58% in 2016; second spray: up to 75.36% in 2015 & 72.90% in 2016) and whiteflies (first spray: up to 78.42% in 2015 & 77.22% in 2016; second spray: up to 71.61% in 2015 & 75.56% in 2016). In Bt cotton, the spray schedule comprising imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ ha) followed by neem oil (3%) gave the maximum mean kapas yield of 2885 & 3048 kg/ha in 2015 & 2016, respectively; whereas in non-Bt cotton, imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ ha) followed by imidacloprid 17.8 SL (200 ml/ ha) recorded the corresponding maximum mean kapas yield of 2300 & 2381 kg/ ha and C: B ratio of 1: 1.35 & 1: 1.36. However, the C: B ratio of Bt cotton was maximum for neem leaf extract (5%) followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG (100 g/ha) i.e., 1: 1.24 in 2015, and fipronil 70 WG (100 g/ha) followed by neem leaf extract (5%) i.e., 1: 1.23 in 2016.
Description
Diversity Management Insect pests Bt non-Bt cotton
Keywords
null
Citation
Surakasula. A, and Swaminathan. R.
Collections