EFFECT OF ORGANIC GROWTH PROMOTERS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF CHICKPEA ( Cicer Arietinum L.) GROWN ON ORGANIC FARM
Loading...
Date
2014-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry Dept., N.M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on the certified
organic farm, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry,
Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari during rabi season of
the year 2012-13 to study the Effect of organic growth promoters
on yield and quality of Chick pea ( Cicer arietinum L.) grown on
organic farm.
The treatment comprises of various organic growth
promoters
viz.,
T1:
BC:VC:CC
+
Panchagavya
(2%),
T2:
BC:VC:CC + Jivamrut (2%), T 3 : BC:VC:CC + Cow urine (2%), T 4 :
BC:VC:CC + Enriched sap (1%), T 5 : BC:VC:CC + Vermibedwash
(2%) and T 6 : BC:VC:CC (Control). These were replicated four
times in RBD.
Treatment receiving application of BC:VC:CC + Cow
urine (2%) (T 3 ) recorded significantly higher values of plant
height, plant spread, number branches per plant, number of pods
per plant at 60 DAS and at harvest as well as other ancillary
growth and yield attributing parameters. Significantly higher
grain (952.30 kg ha - 1 ) and stover (1870.55 kg ha -1 ) yield of
chickpea were observed under the treatment of applicatio n of
BC:VC:CC + Cow urine (2%) (T 3 ) which was at par with
treatment T 4 and T 5 in case of grain yield and with T 4 , T 5 and T 2
in case of stover yield.
Except N the content of all macro and micro nutrients
in chickpea grain and straw were not differed signifi cantly due to
the treatments of different organic growth promoters.
Uptake
of
all
the
macro
and
micro -nutrient
by
chickpea grain and straw were significantly differed due to
different organics growth promoters. Treatment of BC:VC:CC +
Cow urine (2%) (T 3 ) showed significantly higher uptake of all the
nutrients by grain and straw.
Significantly higher protein content was observed with
a treatment of BC:VC:CC + Cow urine (2%) (T 3 ). Whole as a
treatment effect on carbohydrate and fibre content was non -
significant.
Physical (bulk density and WSA) as well as chemical
properties (pH, EC, OC%, available nutrients) does not differed
significantly due to application of various organic growth
promoters.
Various cooking quality parameters such as density,
soaked density, hydration capacity, hydration index, swelling
capacity and swelling index of seed were significantly influenced
due to various organic growth promoters. Higher value of these
parameters were observed with the application of BC:VC:CC +
Cow urine (2%) (T 3 ) and were at par with of the treatments.
Economically, treatment of BC:VC:CC + Cow urine
(2%) proved better, as it gave maximum net realization of Rs.
20671 ha - 1 and highest BCR of 1.77 compared to other treatments.
Description
Keywords
null