Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

19865
Reset filters
Subject: Agronomy × Author: KAU × End date: 1986 × Start date: 1986 × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Production potential of two fodder grasses under different management practices
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 1986) Raghavan Pillai, G; KAU; Madhavan Nair, K P
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Agronomic investigations on 'TARO' (Colocasia esculenta L.) variety - Thamarakannan
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 1986) Mohan Kumar, C R; KAU; Sadanandan, N
    In order to standardize the cultural and fertilizer requirement of two (Colocasia esculata) two separate field experiments were conducted during 1983-84 and 1984-85 at the College of Agriculture, Vellayani. The first experiment (Experiment A) with treatments consisting of two sources of planting material (side and mother corn) four spacing (60 x 30, 45 x 45, 60x 45, 60x60 cm) and five sources of mulching (Green leaf, Coconut coir/husk waste, Water hyacinth, black polythene and no mulch) was conducted in asplit plot design. The second experiment (Experiemnt B) was a 3 x 2 partially confounded factorial design with three levels each of nitrogen (40,80,120 kg ha-1), P2O5 (25, 50,75 kg ha-1), K2O (50, 100,150 kg ha-1) and two times of application (two split application of N and K and three split application of N and K) with two replication
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Production potential of cassava (Manlhot esculent a Grants) intercropped in coconut gardens
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 1986) Ramakrishnan Nayar, T V; KAU; Sadanandan, N
    Field experiments were conducted at the coconut Research Station. Balaramapuram during 1983-84 and 1984-85 to study the production potential of cassava varieties Sreevisakham and Malayan-4, intercropped in coconut gardens, as influenced by planting density, growth regulators and different levels of NPK fertilisers. The cassava hybrid Sreevisakham was superior to the popular cultlvar Maiayan-4 in nuirber of nodes plant 1, number of functional leaves plant™1, leaf area index, net assimilation rate, crop growth rates, dry matter production, utilisation index, tuber bulking rate and in fresh tuber yield. For intercropping one hectare of coconut garden in which coconuts are spaced at 7.5 x 7.5 m, cassava plant population of 8000 (spacing 90 x 90 cm) was found to be optimum to produce maximum fresh tuber yield* Cassava plants at higher planting density, were stunted in growth and produced poor quality tubers. The growth regulators cycocel and ethrel though decreased the plant height, could not Influence either the yield attributes or yield and quality of cassava tubers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Agrotechniques for soil conservation in taungya systems
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 1986) Gopinathan, R; KAU; Sreedharan, C
    An experiment on 'Agrotechniques for soil conservation in taungya systems' was conducted at the Instructional Farm, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara for a period of two years from May 1984 to April 1986. The objectives of the experiment were to asses the run-off, soil and nutrient losses as influenced by the important taungya practices and to evolve economically and ecologically viable agroforestry measures for soil conservation. Eucalyptus , the main tree component , was intercropped with the usually cultivated taungya crops of cassava and rice . The efficiency of cassava planting on ridges, grass farming and grass stripping was also investigated. There were seven treatments replicated thrice in RBD. Daily run-off and soil loss were quantified by installing multi-slot device consisting of 47 slots and brick masonry settling tank specifically designed for the project.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Production potential of cassava-based cropping systems
    (Department of Agronomy, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 1986) Ashokan, P K; KAU; Sreedharan, C
    A series of field experiments were conducted during the years 1983-84 and 1984-85 at College of Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, Trichur, to evaluate some of the cassava based intercropping systems and to investigate the interspecific interactions. There were three field trials and two micro plot trials. In the first field trial, the treatments were factorial combinations of two planing geometries of cassava viz., paired row and square cluster planting geometries of cassava viz., paired row and square cluster planting and four intercropping practices viz., intercropping with colocasia, elephant foot yam, banana and no intercropping. In the second field trial, there wer 12 treatments derived from the factorial combinations of three geometries of planting (paired row, square cluster and triangular cluster) and four intercropping practices (growing a floor crop of cowpea, groundnut, elephant foot yam and not growing any floor crop) in a cassava + banana intercropping system. In the third field trial, the possibility of growing two crops of groundnut in sequence ( Kharif and cowpea and/or Rabi) and the fertilizer requirements of intercrops were studied. All the three field trials were laid out in randomised Block Design and replicated thrice. In one of the micro-plot trials, 32P absorption by the component species in a cassava + banana + elephant foot yam cassava planted in square cluster was studied. polyculture with In the other micro plot trial 32P absorption by cassava and groundnut under the situations of cassava planted in paired row-ridge, mound and flat bed methods were studied. These two microplot trials were laid out in Completely Randomized Design with three replications. Paired row and square clustered planting of cassava gave similar yields as that of normal method when the plant population was the same. Intercropping cassava in square cluster with elephant foot yam resulted in maximum yield of cassava (20.1 t/ha) and elephant foot yam (10.6 t/ha). Banana and colocasia were also found to be successful as intercrops in cassava planted in paired row or square cluster. Intercropping with elephant foot yam and banana resulted in higher yield of cassava. The intercrops colocasia and elephant foot yam recorded lesser yields than the sole crops whereas in intercrop banana such difference was not observed. The maximum LER of 1.81 was obtained in cassava + banana cropping system. The cassava + elephant foot yam intercropping removed 133, 11, 107, 46, 12 and 18 kg/ha of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S respectively wheras in the cassava + banana combination the corresponding figures were 227, 14, 236, 70, 16 and 11 kg/ha. From the two year trials, the cassava + banana + elephant foot yam cropping system with cassava planted in square cluster (9070 plants/ha) / triangular cluster (6800 plants/ha) was found to be the most productive and economical cropping system. Elephant foot yam was found to be shade tolerant and the yield reduction in intercropped situation was only marginal. The floor crops of cowpea and groundnut were successful in the first year. The land equivalent ratio in cassava + banana + elephant foot yam intercropping was 1.7 and this cropping system gave a net profit of Rs. 13300 per hectare. The N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S removal in a cassava + banana + elephant foot yam cropping system was found to be 198, 24, 200, 166, 34 and 19 kg/ha respectively. Sequential intercropping in paired row planted cassava was not successful, but growing groundnut and red gram simultaneously in the interspace was found to be successful; groundnut was harvested after four months, red gram after eight months and cassava after nine months. The fertilizer requirements of intercrop cowpea and groundnut were found to be only about 60-90 per cent of the sole crop recommendation and the optimum doses of N, P and K worked out were 6, 18 and 18 kg/ha for cowpea and 4, 30 and 30 kg/ha for groundnut. The main crop of cassava also was benefited by the application of fertilizers to the intercrops. The organic carbon and total nitrogen content of soil were reduced in two or three component intercropping systems by the two year cropping practices. The exchangeable P, K, Ca, Mg and SO 4 increased in situations where legmues alone were intercopped and decreased when banana and a floor crop of cowpea, groundnut or elephant foot yam were intercropped. The micronutrient status of the soil was not remarkably changed by the two season cropping. The intercrop and sole crop systems were not different in their influence on the post crop nutrient status of the soil. The radiophosphorus applied to the root zone of any of the components in the mixed cropping system cassava + banana + elephant foot yam with cassava in square cluster planting was absorbed not only by the treated plants but also by the surrounding species. Banana was the most dominant component in this polyculture. In the cassava + groundnut cropping system, cassava was the most dominant component, accumulating about 90 to 98 per cent of the 32P applied to cassava on mounds/ridges and about 50 percent of that applied to the groundnut root zone in the interspaces. Groundnut root system was small and less active and was able to derive only about 2 to 5 per cent of the 32P applied to cassava mounds. It was also deduced that the root interactions were stronger when all the components of the intercropping systems were a longer duration and it would be mild with legume intercrops of short duration.