Thumbnail Image

Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur

The history of agricultural education in Kerala can be traced back to the year 1896 when a scheme was evolved in the erstwhile Travancore State to train a few young men in scientific agriculture at the Demonstration Farm, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, presently, the Cropping Systems Research Centre under Kerala Agricultural University. Agriculture was introduced as an optional subject in the middle school classes in the State in 1922 when an Agricultural Middle School was started at Aluva, Ernakulam District. The popularity and usefulness of this school led to the starting of similar institutions at Kottarakkara and Konni in 1928 and 1931 respectively. Agriculture was later introduced as an optional subject for Intermediate Course in 1953. In 1955, the erstwhile Government of Travancore-Cochin started the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at Mannuthy, Thrissur for imparting higher education in agricultural and veterinary sciences, respectively. These institutions were brought under the direct administrative control of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Animal Husbandry, respectively. With the formation of Kerala State in 1956, these two colleges were affiliated to the University of Kerala. The post-graduate programmes leading to M.Sc. (Ag), M.V.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees were started in 1961, 1962 and 1965 respectively. On the recommendation of the Second National Education Commission (1964-66) headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of the University Grants Commission, one Agricultural University in each State was established. The State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) were established in India as an integral part of the National Agricultural Research System to give the much needed impetus to Agriculture Education and Research in the Country. As a result the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) was established on 24th February 1971 by virtue of the Act 33 of 1971 and started functioning on 1st February 1972. The Kerala Agricultural University is the 15th in the series of the SAUs. In accordance with the provisions of KAU Act of 1971, the Agricultural College and Research Institute at Vellayani, and the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, were brought under the Kerala Agricultural University. In addition, twenty one agricultural and animal husbandry research stations were also transferred to the KAU for taking up research and extension programmes on various crops, animals, birds, etc. During 2011, Kerala Agricultural University was trifurcated into Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and Kerala Agricultural University (KAU). Now the University has seven colleges (four Agriculture, one Agricultural Engineering, one Forestry, one Co-operation Banking & Management), six RARSs, seven KVKs, 15 Research Stations and 16 Research and Extension Units under the faculties of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Forestry. In addition, one Academy on Climate Change Adaptation and one Institute of Agricultural Technology offering M.Sc. (Integrated) Climate Change Adaptation and Diploma in Agricultural Sciences respectively are also functioning in Kerala Agricultural University.

Browse

2015 - 20162
Reset filters
Subject: Agriculture × Author: KAU × End date: 2017 × Start date: 2010 × Thesis Type: Ph.D ×
Reset filters

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Development of F1 hybrids of indeterminate tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for protected cultivation
    (Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, 2015) Lekshmi, S L; KAU; Celine, V A
    The present investigation entitled “Development of F1 hybrids of indeterminate tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for protected cultivation” was conducted at the Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, from 2013 to 2015 with the objectives of identifying superior varieties and developing F1 hybrids of indeterminate tomato suited for protected cultivation. The study consisted of two experiments conducted in the naturally ventilated polyhouse of size 50 m x 20 m located at the Instructional Farm, Vellayani. In the first part of the first experiment, 40 tomato genotypes were evaluated for two consecutive years in an RBD with three replications. As the second part, 12 commercial hybrids were evaluated. The second experiment consisted of a 9 x 9 half diallel analysis laid out in an RBD with three replications. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between the genotypes for all the characters for two crops. Pooled analysis revealed that, LE 1 recorded the highest yield (2443.43 g) and fruit weight (108.13 g) followed by LE 7. LE 53 had maximum number of fruits per plant (65.00). In the present study, genotypes had wide variation for quality parameters. Fruits of LE 14 recorded highest TSS with a mean of 5.74 ºBrix. LE 7 had maximum ascorbic acid (30.13 mg/100g) and lycopene content (13.09 mg/100g). Beta carotene value was maximum in LE 16 (184.15 mg/100g). There was minimum incidence of pests, diseases and physiological disorders under protected conditions. Among the 12 hybrids evaluated, INDAM 9802 was the highest yielder (1444.40 g) followed by F1 T 30 (1412.22 g). F1 T 30 recorded maximum fruits per plant (35.66) which was on par with F1 Queen (35.55). Genetic parameters like phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation, heritability and genetic advance were studied to assess the genetic variability among the genotypes. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance were observed for characters like truss per plant, fruits per truss, fruit weight, fruits per plant, yield per plant and yield per plot. Path analysis revealed highest positive direct effect for fruit weight (0.3956), truss per plant (0.3558) and fruits per plant (0.3381). Based on D2 analysis the 40 genotypes were grouped into eight clusters. Cluster I was the largest with twenty four genotypes followed by cluster II with ten genotypes. Diallel analysis was carried out using nine parents selected based on genetic divergence and per se performance. The parents were crossed in a diallel fashion excluding reciprocals to obtain 36 F1 hybrids. The study revealed that P5 x P9 had the highest yield (3114.03 g) which was on par with P6 x P8 (3074.37 g) and P1 x P5 (3077.58 g). P1 x P5 had the maximum fruits per plant (103.93). The magnitude of relative heterosis, heterobeltiosis and standard heterosis varied considerably. For yield, relative heterosis ranged from -32.40 to 92.72, heterobeltiosis from -47.14 to 89.54 and standard heterosis from 2.91 to 160.95. The σ2gca and σ2sca ratio indicated that non-additive gene action was predominant for all traits. Among the nine parents, P9 (LE 1), P5 (LE 20) P1 (LE 2), and P2 (LE 7) were superior for yield and yield attributes. The estimates of sca effects indicated that P5 x P9 (LE 20 x LE 1), P6 x P8 (LE 39 x LE 38) and P1 x P5 (LE 2 x LE 20) were the most promising hybrids for protected cultivation. The present study revealed that the genotypes LE 1 and LE 7 and the hybrids INDAM 9802 and F1 T 30 were superior for yield and yield attributes under protection. Based on the mean performance, standard heterosis and sca effects the three potential crosses viz., P5 x P9, P6 x P8 and P1 x P5 could be adjudged as suitable indeterminate tomato hybrids for protected cultivation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ThesisItemOpen Access
    Silicon availability of tropical soils with respect to Rice nutrition
    (College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, 2016) Arya Lekshmi, V; KAU; Jayasree Sankar, S
    Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in soil. The amount of silicon in soil depends on parent material, soil type, pedogenic process and landscape. In soil solution, Si is present as monosilicic acid which is the only form that the plant can absorb from soil. The productivity of rice is comparatively low in soils of Kerala. As a ̳Si – accumulator‘, rice can benefit from Si nutrition. The application of Si can enhance growth and yield of rice. With this background, studies were conducted to categorize major rice growing soils of Kerala according to plant available silicon and to evaluate the efficacy of different sources of silicon including rice straw in wetland rice. The release of silicon from different soils added with various silicon sources under different water regimes was also monitored. Soil samples were collected from five different locations representing major rice growing regions of Kerala viz., Kuttanad, Kole land, Pokkali, sandy and lateritic to categorize them according to plant available silicon. The available Si ranged from 7.70 mg kg -1 (sandy soil) to 34.91 mg kg -1 (Kole land soil) in the order Kole land > Pokkali > lateritic > Kuttanad > sandy soil. All the soils under study were categorized as low in available Si. The available Si had positive correlation with organic carbon, available N, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, exchangeable K, Ca, Mg and CEC and negative correlation with available boron, AEC and silica-sesquioxide ratio. These soils were subjected to fractionation of silicon. The major fractions of Si were mobile, adsorbed, organic, occluded, amorphous and residual Si. The percentage distribution of fractions of Si in these soils were in the order; residual Si > amorphous Si > occluded Si > organic Si > mobile Si > adsorbed Si. Quantity – intensity relationship of five major rice growing soils at two temperatures viz. 25 0 C and 40 0 C were studied. The highest buffer power was indicated by Kuttanad soil followed by Pokkali and sandy soils at 25 0 C. It clearly indicated that these soils have a higher power to retain Si on solid phase and replenish its concentration in soil solution as and when it is depleted through plant uptake or leaching. The equilibrium Si concentration and the amount of Si adsorbed by each soil were used to test the fitness of data to the adsorption isotherms viz., Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin. The data obtained from the adsorption experiments fitted into Freundlich and Temkin equations, but not to Langmuir equation at 25 0 C. At 40 0 C no adsorption equations were obtained for any soil.An incubation study was conducted to know the extent of release of Si on addition of different sources of silicon such as rice husk ash, biodecomposed rice husk, calcium silicate and sodium silicate in five rice growing soils under submerged water regime (SWR) and field capacity water regime (FCWR). Addition of Si significantly increased the release of available Si in all soils except Kole land soil after a month. Kole land soil showed higher release of available Si after two months. The highest release of available Si was at SWR in case of Kole land and Kuttanad soil, where as Pokkali, sandy and lateritic soils showed more release of available Si at FCWR. Irrespective of soils, treatment with sodium silicate showed higher release of available Si. Total Si showed a decreasing trend over the period of incubation for three months in all the soils. A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Station, Chalakudy to evaluate the efficacy of different sources of silicon including rice straw in wetland rice. Rice husk ash, biodecomposed rice husk, calcium silicate and sodium silicate were used as source of Si along with fertilizers as per package of practice recommendation (NPK alone). The maximum number of panicles per hill, number of spikelets per panicle, thousand grain weights and minimum number of unfilled grains per panicle were recorded in treatment with calcium silicate application. The maximum grain yield of 6.90 t ha -1 was recorded in treatment T 5 (T 2 + Calcium silicate) and significantly superior (fig.54) over all other treatments. This increase in yield may be due to the effect of application of Si on soil fertility, nutrient uptake, and plant growth. The direct effect of Si fertilization on increased number panicle per hill, number of spikelets per panicle, and thousand grain weight and decreased number of unfilled grains per panicle might be the reason for increased grain and straw yield in treatment with calcium silicate. The treatment with POP + sodium silicate showed the highest uptake of Si by grain and straw of rice. The sources of Si had no residual effect on grain and straw yield of succeeding rice crop. In general, sandy soil low in available Si had a high response to applied Si in achieving higher grain yield.