Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar

After independence, development of the rural sector was considered the primary concern of the Government of India. In 1949, with the appointment of the Radhakrishnan University Education Commission, imparting of agricultural education through the setting up of rural universities became the focal point. Later, in 1954 an Indo-American team led by Dr. K.R. Damle, the Vice-President of ICAR, was constituted that arrived at the idea of establishing a Rural University on the land-grant pattern of USA. As a consequence a contract between the Government of India, the Technical Cooperation Mission and some land-grant universities of USA, was signed to promote agricultural education in the country. The US universities included the universities of Tennessee, the Ohio State University, the Kansas State University, The University of Illinois, the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Missouri. The task of assisting Uttar Pradesh in establishing an agricultural university was assigned to the University of Illinois which signed a contract in 1959 to establish an agricultural University in the State. Dean, H.W. Hannah, of the University of Illinois prepared a blueprint for a Rural University to be set up at the Tarai State Farm in the district Nainital, UP. In the initial stage the University of Illinois also offered the services of its scientists and teachers. Thus, in 1960, the first agricultural university of India, UP Agricultural University, came into being by an Act of legislation, UP Act XI-V of 1958. The Act was later amended under UP Universities Re-enactment and Amendment Act 1972 and the University was rechristened as Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology keeping in view the contributions of Pt. Govind Ballabh Pant, the then Chief Minister of UP. The University was dedicated to the Nation by the first Prime Minister of India Pt Jawaharlal Nehru on 17 November 1960. The G.B. Pant University is a symbol of successful partnership between India and the United States. The establishment of this university brought about a revolution in agricultural education, research and extension. It paved the way for setting up of 31 other agricultural universities in the country.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • ThesisItemOpen Access
    Socio-economic impact and financial feasibility of tractorization in Chitwan district of Nepal
    (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145 (Uttarakhand), 2006-06) Dhakal, Shiva Chandra; Anil Kumar
    The study was conducted in Chitwan district of Nepal to examine the socio-economic impact and financial feasibility of tractors which are increasingly becoming popular in the area for agricultural and non-agricultural purposes. The study was based on a survey of 50 farmers, 30 from tractor farms and 20 from bullock farms. The data related to the year 2004-05. Simple descriptive statistical tools including regression analysis technique and discounted measures of investment appraisal were used to accomplish different objectives of the study. The study revealed that, percentage of gross cropped area covered by paddy, maize and wheat was slightly higher (72.7%) on tractor farms as compared to bullock farms (69.0%). The average cropping intensity of tractor farms was found to be 170.34 per cent, while it was 160.52 per cent for bullock farms. Average level of use of HYVs and number of irrigation were higher in tractor farms by 39.4 and 21.9 per cent, respectively as compared to bullock farms. Average crop diversification index for tractor farms (0.79) was slightly lower than bullock farms (0.81) indicating that the diversification in terms of crops was comparatively more on bullock farms than on tractor farms. Dairy and goat rearing were more popular on bullock farms (70 and 80%, respectively) than on tractor farms. The results indicated that tractor farms preferred non-conventional on-farm activities like poultry, beekeeping, nursery etc.; and services, business, sawmill operation for non-farm diversification. Gross farm revenue, gross farms family income, returns to family labour and capital, returns to family owned capital, returns to management, net crop income per hectare of cropped land/net cultivated land were higher on tractor farms by about 527, 164, 182, 310, 76, 31 and 41 per cent, respectively as compared to bullock farms. Average annual hired human labour employed, total human labour employed and off-farm employment were higher on tractor farms by about 355, 19 and 53 per cent, respectively than on bullock farms. The study revealed that human labour, cash expenses and tractor labour were efficiently used on tractor farms. Cash expense was inefficiently utilized on bullock farms, at the level less than required. Average tractors (35 HP) were utilized for about 927 hours, 35 per cent more hours than for required break-even level. Benefit-cost ratio, net benefit-investment ratio, net present worth and internal rate of return were 1.07, 1.68, Rs. 1,73,662 and 34 per cent, respectively before financing as against 1.17, 1.70, Rs. 4,63,982 and 48 per cent, respectively after financing which passed the test for financial feasibility regarding investment in tractor for an average farm size of 1.45 ha. For increasing cropping intensity and area under major cereals necessary efforts should be made regarding irrigation facility, extension services and distribution of HYVs. In order to bridge gap between tractor and bullock farms regarding income and employment concerned agencies should give emphasis on education, infrastructure development, simplifying loan transaction procedure and cost and, improved packages of technology on livestock husbandry. For magnifying positive impact of tractorization it is desirable to develop and promote system of tractor hiring and from cooperative societies, lending tractor loan on joint collateral system and, rental market for tractor.